Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Was there an evolution in format from (HIGH . LOW), via (HIGH LOW), to
> (HIGH LOW MICRO)?
>
> Yes. Both (HIGH LOW) and (HIGH LOW MICRO) are valid now.
> It is useful to accept (HIGH . LOW) as well.
>
> Shall I fix time-less-p and time-su
Was there an evolution in format from (HIGH . LOW), via (HIGH LOW), to
(HIGH LOW MICRO)?
Yes. Both (HIGH LOW) and (HIGH LOW MICRO) are valid now.
It is useful to accept (HIGH . LOW) as well.
Shall I fix time-less-p and time-subtract to deal with (HIGH LOW
MICRO) arguments as well
