Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:14:59 -0800: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tak Ota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:19:03 -0800: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Tak Ota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi Kim,
> >> >
> >> > Sorry I neglected having my homework done before repor
Tak Ota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:19:03 -0800: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Tak Ota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Hi Kim,
>> >
>> > Sorry I neglected having my homework done before reporting the
>> > incident. Now I've narrowed it to a specific case. Here is the
Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:19:03 -0800: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tak Ota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi Kim,
> >
> > Sorry I neglected having my homework done before reporting the
> > incident. Now I've narrowed it to a specific case. Here is the
> > recipe.
> >
> > 1. Start emacs with emacs
Tak Ota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Kim,
>
> Sorry I neglected having my homework done before reporting the
> incident. Now I've narrowed it to a specific case. Here is the
> recipe.
>
> 1. Start emacs with emacs -Q
> 2. Evaluate this:
>
> (progn
>(setq w32-bdf-filename-alist
>
Hi Kim,
Sorry I neglected having my homework done before reporting the
incident. Now I've narrowed it to a specific case. Here is the
recipe.
1. Start emacs with emacs -Q
2. Evaluate this:
(progn
(setq w32-bdf-filename-alist
(w32-find-bdf-fonts '("c:/emacs/intlfonts-1.1/Test")))
Tak Ota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Today's CVS code fails assertion at line 19773 in xdisp.c when info is
> invoked. it->descent being -1 is the problem. Following is the call
> stack.
Hi Tak,
I cannot reproduce this on GNU/Linux.
Does it happen with emacs -Q ?
If not, what local setting t
