Re: generic-x needs to require generic

2005-03-22 Thread Lute Kamstra
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > Because bootstrap-emacs does not have the newest autoloads > preloaded, but rather the old ones from ldefs-boot.el. I see. Tricky stuff. [...] > I've now updated lips/ldefs-boot.el and removed the require from > generic-x.el again. Thanks!

Re: generic-x needs to require generic

2005-03-22 Thread Andreas Schwab
Lute Kamstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The warnings indicate that the define-generic-mode macro is not > defined when generic-x.el is compiled. define-generic-mode is an > autoloaded macro in generic.el and it seems that autoloads for > generic.el are created. So why isn't generic loaded whe

Re: generic-x needs to require generic

2005-03-22 Thread Lute Kamstra
Lute Kamstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Luc Teirlinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> What is the purpose of the following change to generic-x, which breaks >> bootstrapping: >> >> * generic-x.el: Don't prevent compilation. Don't require generic. >> Follow coding conventions. Minor

Re: generic-x needs to require generic

2005-03-22 Thread Lute Kamstra
Luc Teirlinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is the purpose of the following change to generic-x, which breaks > bootstrapping: > > * generic-x.el: Don't prevent compilation. Don't require generic. > Follow coding conventions. Minor code cleanup. > > I am referring to the "Don't