Could it have anything to do with the fact that the Lisp manual is not
distributed under the GPL?
The specific license of any particular file should not matter for this.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mail
Lute Kamstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Does anybody know why authors in lisp/emacs-lisp/authors.el doesn't
>> parse ChangeLogs in lispref/? I'd like to change that.
>>
>> Perhaps it has not been updated since we put lispref/ into the E
Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anybody know why authors in lisp/emacs-lisp/authors.el doesn't
> parse ChangeLogs in lispref/? I'd like to change that.
>
> Perhaps it has not been updated since we put lispref/ into the Emacs
> distribution.
It explicitly excludes lisp
Does anybody know why authors in lisp/emacs-lisp/authors.el doesn't
parse ChangeLogs in lispref/? I'd like to change that.
Perhaps it has not been updated since we put lispref/ into the Emacs
distribution. Maybe there are other dirs it doesn't cover, too.
Could you check?
_
Does anybody know why authors in lisp/emacs-lisp/authors.el doesn't
parse ChangeLogs in lispref/? I'd like to change that.
Lute.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
