> From: Jason Rumney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:18:20 +0100
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> It is better to change the dialog, for example to an MB_YESNO dialog
> with the question being whether to debug or not.
Done. Thanks for the tip.
__
> From: Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 06:30:08 -0400
>
> However, `w32_abort' does in fact return, if the user clicks "Ignore"
> on the dialog it pops up.
>
> It should not return.
I changed it so it doesn't now
However, `w32_abort' does in fact return, if the user clicks "Ignore"
on the dialog it pops up.
It should not return.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see any easy way of solving this problem except if we modify
> `w32_abort' to never return, even if the user clicks "Ignore".
> Personally, I don't see any reason to support the Ignore option. Is
> it okay to call, e.g., `exit' in that case inst
The W32 build of Emacs redefines `abort' thusly:
#define abort w32_abort
on s/ms-w32.h, and then defines `w32_abort' on w32fns.c. Since
config.h is included before all the other headers, when the compiler
sees stdlib.h, where there's a prototype of `abort', it thinks that
`w32_abort' is a fu
