Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

p-hide-delay 3) and (setq tooltip-hide-delay 4) as well as customize the `internal-border-width' of `tooltip-frame-parameters' to 2. What do you think? Regards, -- Christian Schlauer ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

#x27;t seen him on this list lately. Who is making such decisions now? (Please see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/41032> for details.) [1] "everybody" = three individuals (including me) -- Christian Schlauer ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

Jason Rumney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Christian Schlauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Frank Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> "Drew Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>> 1. the `padding&#

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

ltip should be a `hint', but the large padding makes them more like a `banner'. (I don't want to turn them off either as I think they are quite useful -- they are just a little too big in my opinion.) , | tooltip-frame-parameters's value is | ((name . "t

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

Jason Rumney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Christian Schlauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> What about my other suggestion: changing `internal-border-width' of >> `tooltip-frame-parameters' to 2 instead of 5? > > I don't have any objec

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

t;current"/"non-current" about? I can see that `fine differences' are "non-current" and the rest of the difference region is "current". (info "(ediff)Highlighting Difference Regions") doesn't explain this, it is only about the faces. Maybe those tooltips are superfluous and should be taken out? -- Christian Schlauer ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

difference regions are not mouse-sensitive in a special way, mouse-1/2/3 work as usual, so there is no special function for mouse-1/2/3 that has to be explained, and the tooltip string tells me things I can see somewhere else (which difference region I am in) and things I don't understand ("non-current" and "current"). -- Christian Schlauer ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

Jason Rumney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Christian Schlauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Jason Rumney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> We should find out exactly what GNOME uses (it may be a fraction of >>> the font height for examp

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

Christian Schlauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [placement of tooltips in relation to the mouse pointer] > I think the current offset is fine. I changed my mind: as Jason writes, most applications (including GNOME and Mozilla Firefox) put tooltips below the pointer, so Emacs sh

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

is easily readable why not make the default font smaller >> instead? > > IMHO it looks better if the tooltip font is slightly smaller than the > default font. I agree. How does GNOME do this? -- Christian Schlauer ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

Christian Schlauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > On Ubuntu, Firefox is integrated in GNOME though and uses > GNOME-sized tooltips. I have to correct myself: Firefox uses its own tooltip-size on both w32 and on GNOME 2.10 (Ubuntu). -- Christ

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

15. What about 0.8? It is reasonable with both fonts I tried, although the effect is less pronounced with the `default' font on Ubuntu. -- Christian Schlauer ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

the `padding' of the tooltips. No one was against that change. Can this be changed? Regards, -- Christian Schlauer ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

ws (i.e., reading the tooltips of toolbar icons in the echo area -> uncomfortable).) -- Christian Schlauer ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Yet another emacs icons

the GNOME/OpenOffice icon designer mentioned in <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/42403>? -- Christian Schlauer ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'?

Luc Teirlinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Christian Schlauer wrote: > >But do you read them in the echo area? I disabled tooltip-mode, but >I'm not used to move my eyes up and down between the mouse pointer >somewhere in the buffer to the correspondin