Re: calendar problems

2005-03-10 Thread Ed Reingold
> > Something has broken in `mark-diary-entries' such that (setq > > mark-diary-entries-in-calendar t) and related no longer work > > correctly. It seems to be setting point to the beginning of the > > calendar buffer (I think the previous behavior was to leave it on > > the current date.) > > I

Re: calendar problems

2005-03-12 Thread Ed Reingold
> You stopped maintaining the calendar code long ago, so I asked > Glenn Morris to maintain it. He has been doing this for a year, > and doing a good job. *I* never stopped anything. ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.

Re: bootstrap from scratch

2005-05-04 Thread Ed Reingold
> Perhaps `calendar-latitude' and `calendar-longitude' should be set to > 0.0 rather than nil by defcustom. (I have done that, but tested it > only with a `make recompile', since I do not want to do a bootstrap > again.) Very bad idea. Then a user will never know that the times of events (solar/

Re: bootstrap from scratch

2005-05-05 Thread Ed Reingold
> Perhaps it would be better to set `calendar-latitude' to 51.5 and > `calendar-longitude' to 0.0 by default but then tell people who want > to learn about solar and lunar times that that default location is for > Greenwich, England. That info should go away if `calendar-latitude' > and `calendar-

Re: bootstrap from scratch

2005-05-05 Thread Ed Reingold
> Ed Reingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This is a conundrum: Any value that lets the compilation proceed will > > (necessarily) produce wrong results. Any value that stops the calculation > > if > > the latitude/longitude/zone are not set will sto

Re: bootstrap from scratch

2005-05-05 Thread Ed Reingold
> Here's what I have as a possible fix. It will fix bootstrap, but it > won't fix the case if someone is interactively compiling a file which > requires appt, and doesn't have lat & long set. Presumably anyone requiring appt AND using the solar/lunar stuff will have that set already! ___