[Orgmode] What does this mean in *agenda*

2007-03-22 Thread Leo
I have seen the following in buffer brought up by C-c a t. , | Available with `N r': (0)ALL (1)ACTION (2)WAITING (3)DONE ` but when I key 'N r', nothing happens. Best, -- Leo sdl.web AT gmail.com (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)

[Orgmode] Re: Smarter indent with C-j

2007-03-22 Thread Leo
On 2007-03-07, Carsten Dominik said: Fixed, thanks. - Carsten I just noticed one minor issue for check boxes. As in org 4.69: - [ ] Check box 1--- C-j |--- cursor moved here I think the following is more elegant: - [ ] Check box 1--- C-j |--- cursor moved here What do

[Orgmode] Re: What does this mean in *agenda*

2007-03-22 Thread Leo
On 2007-03-22, Carsten Dominik said: Try 0 r or 1 r or 2 r or 3 r. - Carsten Ah, every nice ;) On Mar 22, 2007, at 8:55, Leo wrote: I have seen the following in buffer brought up by C-c a t. , | Available with `N r': (0)ALL (1)ACTION (2)WAITING (3)DONE ` but when I key 'N

[Orgmode] Re: Org-mode version 4.68

2007-03-22 Thread Leo
On 2007-03-13, Carsten Dominik said: - Improvements to the date/time prompt. + When you move (using S-cursor keys) the cursor in the pop-up calendar window while responding to a date/time prompt, the prompt is updated with the new default date. Works only under

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 22, 2007, at 0:28, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 23:21 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: On Mar 21, 2007, at 15:27, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: All I really need it for is multiple DONE states (e.g. COMPLETED vs. CANCELLED).

Re: [Orgmode] Todo-list agendas with multiple

2007-03-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 21, 2007, at 15:41, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: The progress on multiple TODO sequences has reminded me of a small thing that bugs me with TODO keyword search agendas. It's not possible to have a TODO keyword search agenda that matches multiple keywords (such as SOMEDAY|MAYBE). You can

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-22 Thread Jason F. McBrayer
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thank you very much, but this is a bit tricky, so maybe I should do this. I'd guess it would be better for you to do it. I had a look at what would be involved, and a working change would touch a lot more places in the file than I thought it would,

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 22, 2007, at 16:21, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: If you send me a complex patch, we need to get your papers with the FSF first, or I cannot install the fixes into Emacs. I already have the papers from David and Piotr, so if you plan to contribute code in the future, maybe we should go

Re: [Orgmode] org-mode and longlines-mode (especially tables)

2007-03-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 19, 2007, at 13:46, Alan Dove wrote: Hey, folks: I've also been using org-mode with longlines-mode, and had noticed that the two occasionally conflict. I've just developed workarounds for the bugs that affect me, mostly inserting extra carriage returns here and there to ensure the

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Smarter indent with C-j

2007-03-22 Thread Leo
I CC the list. On 2007-03-22, Eddward DeVilla said: On 3/22/07, Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2007-03-07, Carsten Dominik said: Fixed, thanks. - Carsten I just noticed one minor issue for check boxes. As in org 4.69: - [ ] Check box 1--- C-j |--- cursor moved here I