Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-03 Thread Jason F. McBrayer
Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 3. Offer some kind of Easy org installation. >- Effectively a distro of Emacs tailored to Org-mode. >- Ship with an installer. >- Give it a catchier product name. IMO making sure that Emacs-W32 and Aquamacs always ship a current version of o

[Orgmode] Re: Using column view on a sparse tree displaying only a few tags.

2008-04-03 Thread Bernt Hansen
Jose Robins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However the only thing is that I've defined COLUMNS for the whole file using > the #+COLUMNS keyword at the top of the file. I guess those properties are not > being considered in the column view on the agenda buffer. It comes up with the > default column

[Orgmode] Re: Using column view on a sparse tree displaying only a few tags.

2008-04-03 Thread Jose Robins
Thanks Bernt, that works! However the only thing is that I've defined COLUMNS for the whole file using the #+COLUMNS keyword at the top of the file. I guess those properties are not being considered in the column view on the agenda buffer. It comes up with the default column properties I gu

[Orgmode] Re: Using column view on a sparse tree displaying only a few tags.

2008-04-03 Thread Bernt Hansen
Jose Robins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Let's say I have a org tree with some tasks tagged with the keyword ":today:". > Now I do a sparse tree matching the today tag and this would limit the display > to only items with tag "today". Tag your tasks with :today: then do an agenda view tag match

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-03 Thread Rick Moynihan
Joel J. Adamson wrote: Manish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Rick Moynihan wrote: > Emacs might be Org's greatest ally, but it's also simultaneously > Org's biggest problem. My point here, isn't to bash Emacs, it is > what it is, and it's damn good... But

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-03 Thread Rick Moynihan
Bastien wrote: Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: It's a shame Taskpaper doesn't just use a subset of org-mode's syntax really. What would it be useful for? Using both TaskPaper and org-mode? I think people using TaskPaper are not likely to use org-mode and vice versa. No. Like

[Orgmode] Using column view on a sparse tree displaying only a few tags.

2008-04-03 Thread Jose Robins
Let's say I have a org tree with some tasks tagged with the keyword ":today:". Now I do a sparse tree matching the today tag and this would limit the display to only items with tag "today". Now if I would like to do a column view on that sparse tree by doing C-c C-x C-c. However this does not

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-03 Thread Bastien
Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's a shame Taskpaper doesn't just use a subset of org-mode's syntax > really. What would it be useful for? Using both TaskPaper and org-mode? I think people using TaskPaper are not likely to use org-mode and vice versa. I tend to agree some of th

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-03 Thread Joel J. Adamson
Manish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Rick Moynihan wrote: > > Emacs might be Org's greatest ally, but it's also simultaneously > > Org's biggest problem. My point here, isn't to bash Emacs, it is > > what it is, and it's damn good... But with apologies to

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-03 Thread Tim O'Callaghan
To be honest when i first read it i thought it was a good idea. I saw it as an extension of your splitting the big org file into the smaller include files in the git repo. > > What people miss when they are new to Org-mode is this: > > Don't try to set up the "final" task managing system from th

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-03 Thread Rick Moynihan
Manish wrote: On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Rick Moynihan wrote: > Eddward DeVilla wrote: > > > I guess the best way to address this problem might be to document up > > front that org-mode uses a simple, readable, text only format and that > > all of the features can be used indepen

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-03 Thread Manish
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Rick Moynihan wrote: > Eddward DeVilla wrote: > > > I guess the best way to address this problem might be to document up > > front that org-mode uses a simple, readable, text only format and that > > all of the features can be used independently of each o

Re: [Orgmode] Re: emacs 23.0.60.1

2008-04-03 Thread Bastien
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry that I need to correct this, but also as modified by Bastien this > is still the old, obsolete form. The correct setting would be > > '(org-todo-keywords (quote (sequence "TODO" "NOTE" "LATER" "VERIFY" "BUG" "|" > "DONE"))) > > No setting of org

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-03 Thread Rick Moynihan
Eddward DeVilla wrote: I guess the best way to address this problem might be to document up front that org-mode uses a simple, readable, text only format and that all of the features can be used independently of each other but that they do interact well together. (It's been a while since I've sc

Re: [Orgmode] Re: emacs 23.0.60.1

2008-04-03 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Apr 2, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Bastien wrote: lanas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: '(org-todo-keywords (quote ("TODO" "NOTE" "LATER" "VERIFY" "BUG" "DONE") org-todo-interpretation (quote sequence))) Once this line is commented out, then org mode works nicely. That's great. It's nice to have th