Re: [Orgmode] emacs IDE and org

2008-05-09 Thread Tim O'Callaghan
2008/5/9 Rockefeller, Harry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is anyone using org mode in a software development process? An IDE, emacs is > no exception, assumes the source code is primary, having tools and methods > to edit source code files but not org files. org files, however, appear to > have all those

[Orgmode] emacs IDE and org

2008-05-09 Thread Rockefeller, Harry
Is anyone using org mode in a software development process? An IDE, emacs is no exception, assumes the source code is primary, having tools and methods to edit source code files but not org files. org files, however, appear to have all those other features desired in a development process: todo it

[Orgmode] Re: Property for startup visibility?

2008-05-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2008-05-08 Thu, at 13:03, Carsten Dominik wrote: I am starting to like the idea. Wow, I've never felt so convincing before! Thought-experiment: Should the VISIBILITY property be automatically inherited? I dont think so. Better to make possible values for the visibility tha

Re: [Orgmode] Problems Compiling 6.02b

2008-05-09 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Ian, I believe this has to do with the fact that ad-to-diary-list is being renamed to diary-add-to-list, and some confusion with the macro declare function. The bug seems to happen in the line when org-exp.el does (require 'org- agenda). Things work fin on my system, I see that you al

[Orgmode] Re: Property for startup visibility?

2008-05-09 Thread Carsten Dominik
On May 8, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: Thought-experiment: Should the VISIBILITY property be automatically inherited? I dont think so. Better to make possible values for the visibility that affect the entire tree below. For example: folded children (like the local "child