Hi everyone,
I'd be happy to change the default to
infodir = $(prefix)/share/info
if this is a better default for most systems. Is it better? So could
people on
different systems out there please check where the standard info
directory is located?
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Oct 8, 2008,
Hi Eric,
one conceivable way out would be this:
First you do create a column view that does contain all the columns
that you need, and then you use TBLFM to create additional columns
with the desired results. That will leave you with a table with all
the values you need, but with a few co
Hi,
In columnview, I'm looking to be able to apply a calc/elisp function to
a columns values before the column view is generated. This is
specifically for columnviews captured in tables.
(see info:org:Capturing column view)
This has come up before, and Carsten was nice enough to make it possi
Hi,
there where questions about custom links here from time to time.
I thought I'd share my way of displaying man pages, info pages
and such.
This is how I set up my custom links:
(setq org-link-abbrev-alist
'(("man" . "http://localhost/man.php?q=man&what=%s";)
("info". "http:/
On Wed, Oct 08 2008, Robert Goldman wrote:
> I think this means that I don't really understand the meaning of
> SCHEDULED, nor do I understand how the agendas are composed. But I'm
> looking at the info manual now, and I'm not actually enlightened.
>
> Is there something I should do to tag someth
Manish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> So it seems like "SCHEDULED" is just the Wrong Thing for stuff like my
>> meeting. Is there any different flag I could use that would give me a
>> single appearance in the Agenda?
>
> I am sorry I am not aware of any such TODO keyword/tag. I was not
> awa
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> Manish wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
>> > I have an org file which the agenda sees in which I put an outline item
>> > with notes from a meeting. The header for this item is as follows:
>> >
>> > *
Bernt Hansen wrote:
> Robert Goldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I have an org file which the agenda sees in which I put an outline item
>> with notes from a meeting. The header for this item is as follows:
>>
>> * Tasks
>> ...
>> * * Meeting with
>> SCHEDULED: <2008-10-06 Mon>
>> ...
Manish wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> > I have an org file which the agenda sees in which I put an outline item
> > with notes from a meeting. The header for this item is as follows:
> >
> > * Tasks
> > ...
> > * * Meeting with
> > SCHEDULED:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> I have an org file which the agenda sees in which I put an outline item
> with notes from a meeting. The header for this item is as follows:
>
> * Tasks
> ...
> * * Meeting with
> SCHEDULED: <2008-10-06 Mon>
> ...
>
Robert Goldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have an org file which the agenda sees in which I put an outline item
> with notes from a meeting. The header for this item is as follows:
>
> * Tasks
> ...
> * * Meeting with
> SCHEDULED: <2008-10-06 Mon>
> ...
>
> What I was somewhat surpris
I have an org file which the agenda sees in which I put an outline item
with notes from a meeting. The header for this item is as follows:
* Tasks
...
* * Meeting with
SCHEDULED: <2008-10-06 Mon>
...
What I was somewhat surprised to see was that this continues to roll
down my agenda, e.g.
Giovanni Ridolfi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- Mer 8/10/08, Richard Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>> There might be an inconsistency in the install process.
>> Well, on my debian system.
>>
>> In the Makefile we have
>>
>> ,
>> | # Where local software is found
>> | prefix=/usr/
Richard Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There might be an inconsistency in the install process. Well, on my
> debian system.
>
> In the Makefile we have
>
> ,
> | # Where local software is found
> | prefix=/usr/local
> |
> | # Where local lisp files go.
> | lispdir = $(prefix)/share/emacs
--- Mer 8/10/08, Richard Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> There might be an inconsistency in the install process.
> Well, on my debian system.
>
> In the Makefile we have
>
> ,
> | # Where local software is found
> | prefix=/usr/local
> |
> | # Where local lisp files go.
> | lispdir
There might be an inconsistency in the install process. Well, on my
debian system.
In the Makefile we have
,
| # Where local software is found
| prefix=/usr/local
|
| # Where local lisp files go.
| lispdir = $(prefix)/share/emacs/site-lisp
|
| # Where info files go.
| infodir = $(prefix)/i
Hi Carsten,
Today's git doesn't seem to find old attachments which is probably a bug.
I created a task with an attachment using org-mode commit
5548357d71234dee252ed8c649435139ebad216a.
I updated to the latest git version today (commit
3d5bc9ab655065486455e4005b24a1d7bd1fe137) and trying to open
>> I am sure there's more to it but this was enough for me to be
>> convinced of it's utility. I just wish that:
>>
>> 1. it copied attachemnts instead of moving them (may be an option),
>> and
>
> I have now:
>
> - select the preferred method with org-attachment-method (cp or m
On Oct 6, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Manish wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Austin Frank wrote:
As always, thanks so much for the hard work! And also to John!
On Sun, Oct 05 2008, Carsten Dominik wrote:
New attachment system
-
You can now attach files to each node in
19 matches
Mail list logo
