On Oct 5, 2009, at 2:23 AM, Sebastian wrote:
Hello Worg,
I'm currently (still) sitting in front of a little tutorial (images in
XHTML export).
Every now and then, I'd like to display a (info/warning) box. Locally,
what I do is this:
In the head section of the Org-file, I define four
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
2.) This is the crucial point: can we have (have we?)
a common #+SETUPFILE:, where we could define those
macros? That way we could use those boxes in all
our files, and they all would look the same, even
if changed.
Bug report+testcase
Hi, I found a bug related to lists within footnotes [1]. org-mode from
git (release_6.31.27.g407b).
[1] To reproduce it:
- open this test case
- C-c C-e b
- notice that this list doesn't appear under the „footnotes“ section,
but *mixed with the „end list“ at the end*
Note
Am Montag, den 05.10.2009, 14:52 +0800 schrieb Bastien:
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
2.) This is the crucial point: can we have (have we?)
a common #+SETUPFILE:, where we could define those
macros? That way we could use those boxes in all
our files,
On Oct 5, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Sebastian wrote:
Am Montag, den 05.10.2009, 14:52 +0800 schrieb Bastien:
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
2.) This is the crucial point: can we have (have we?)
a common #+SETUPFILE:, where we could define those
macros? That way we could
Sebastian sebastian_r...@gmx.de writes:
Am Montag, den 05.10.2009, 14:52 +0800 schrieb Bastien:
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
2.) This is the crucial point: can we have (have we?)
a common #+SETUPFILE:, where we could define those
macros? That way we could
Am Montag, den 05.10.2009, 21:44 +0800 schrieb Bastien:
Sebastian sebastian_r...@gmx.de writes:
Am Montag, den 05.10.2009, 14:52 +0800 schrieb Bastien:
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
2.) This is the crucial point: can we have (have we?)
a common
At Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:05:38 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Oct 2, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Darlan Cavalcante Moreira darc...@gmail.com wrote:
At Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:55:22 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Do we need to implement a way so that text can be made to flow
I have set org-agenda-prefix-format to: (org-agenda-prefix-format %-8:c )
making the agenda look like so:
home:[ ] brainstorm redesign home
evening school: [ ] chose DE spec.
evening school: [ ] ask Lea re: spec topics
evening school: [ ] brainstorm Learners Group
eraldo: [ ]
Even graphics made in tikz, that does not use postscript commands, do not appear
in DVI viewers. I haven't used the preview-latex with graphics in AucTeX, but if
it is able to view graphics made with pstricks, as it appears to be the case,
then maybe it is better to first investigate how
On Oct 5, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Darlan Cavalcante Moreira wrote:
Even graphics made in tikz, that does not use postscript commands,
do not appear
in DVI viewers. I haven't used the preview-latex with graphics in
AucTeX, but if
it is able to view graphics made with pstricks, as it appears to
Some idea about remember variations:
+1, can we keep/have:
- the templates,
- possibility to 'pick file/topic first then remember'
Actually what I would find useful is a task dispatcher for Emacs: a way to go
to common tasks with a few keys.
For instance: C-c C-x C-g would open your
I've been watching this thread closely. At this point I want to jump in.
I like the ideas that have been posted here so far, about a different way of
organizing remember in org. I'm not completely certain, but it seems that
part of what was asked for earlier is included in org-remember already,
13 matches
Mail list logo
