Re: [O] LaTeX export: footnotes vs. angle brackets in Babel snippets

2011-11-19 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: The LaTeX exporter of Org 7.7 from a recent Emacs snapshot improperly interprets sequences with angle brackets in Babel snippets as if they were footnote references, as in: #+BEGIN_src C int array[2]; #+END_src This leads to a

[O] Bugs in lisp/ob-lilypond.el

2011-11-19 Thread Torsten Anders
Dear Martyn Jago, dear all, I just pulled the latest version of Org mode and noticed a few bugs in the Lilypond support of Org babel that have not been there in the previous version (so far I was still using version 7.6). In general, there seems to be problems in parsing the line that starts

Re: [O] Not overwriting unchanged source code files when tangling

2011-11-19 Thread Rustom Mody
Such tools are for example scons is a make alternative that rethinks make's older timestamp = rebuild From www.scons.org/architecture/index.html *(S)Cons decides if a file was out-of-date by using MD5 checksums of the contents of files, not timestamps. * SCons also comes to mind because you

Re: [O] How to estimate effort by week?

2011-11-19 Thread Bernt Hansen
Christoph LANGE ch.la...@jacobs-university.de writes: Hi Christian, 2011-11-18 17:32 Christian Egli: Christoph LANGEch.la...@jacobs-university.de writes: is there any way of estimating effort by week? Have a look at the doc string of org-effort-durations. Documentation: Conversion

Re: [O] Bugs in lisp/ob-lilypond.el

2011-11-19 Thread Torsten Anders
Also, the setting results: silent seems to be ignored. Best wishes, Torsten On 19 Nov 2011, at 15:22, Torsten Anders wrote: Dear Martyn Jago, dear all, I just pulled the latest version of Org mode and noticed a few bugs in the Lilypond support of Org babel that have not been there in

Re: [O] Not overwriting unchanged source code files when tangling

2011-11-19 Thread Rustom Mody
Sorry for the earlier mail: Send got pressed on a half-cooked mail :-) Heres a cleanup. -- Build-tools like scons rethink make's older timestamp = rebuild model. You may want to look at one such. From

Re: [O] Not overwriting unchanged source code files when tangling

2011-11-19 Thread cberry
Holger Hoefling hhoef...@gmail.com writes: Hi Carsten, thanks for the suggestion, but as I agree with Brian. If there is more than one source file in the org-file, then the whole project would still be recompiled, not just the updated file.To be more exact, I actually don#39;t want to compile

[O] Feature request: hide target brackets

2011-11-19 Thread Scott Otterson
Targets and radio targets are great for ensuring that internal hyperlinks go to the right place in your org document. The problem with them, though, is that they clutter up the text, making it less readable. Attempts to get around this problem cause more problems. For example, to avoid the

Re: [O] Not overwriting unchanged source code files when tangling

2011-11-19 Thread Holger Hoefling
Hi everyone, I wanted to thank everyone for their helpful suggestions and wanted to share the best solutions I heard of and found. One solution is to include a rule in the makefile for every sourcecode file that that copies it and only updates the copy if something has changed (see Nick's email

[O] pc-keys mode does not work in org mode

2011-11-19 Thread Cecil Westerhof
I just started using: http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/download/pc-keys.el Very handy indeed. As far as I can see know, it works okay except in org-mode. I think this is because of these two lines in org.el: (define-key org-mode-map [home] 'org-beginning-of-line) (define-key

Re: [O] Details of compling and running C++ code from Org-mode?

2011-11-19 Thread Michael Hannon
Nice.  Very interesting and informative.  Thanks, Eric. -- Mike - Original Message - From: Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com To: Michael Hannon jm_han...@yahoo.com Cc: Org-Mode List emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 11:39 AM Subject: Re: [O] Details of

Re: [O] Bugs in lisp/ob-lilypond.el

2011-11-19 Thread Martyn Jago
Hi Torston Torsten Anders torsten.and...@beds.ac.uk writes: Also, the setting results: silent seems to be ignored. Best wishes, Torsten On 19 Nov 2011, at 15:22, Torsten Anders wrote: Dear Martyn Jago, dear all, I just pulled the latest version of Org mode and noticed a few bugs in

[O] [PATCH] Fix marker in no buffer error for task state change in an indirect buffer

2011-11-19 Thread Bernt Hansen
* lisp/org-clock.el (org-clock-out-if-current): Fix marker in no buffer error for task state change in an indirect buffer org-clock-out-when-current was enhanced in 098cf35 (Clock: Clock out when done also in indirect buffers, 2009-03-23) to handle indirect buffers. This enhancement uses

[O] Bug: Cloning tasks deletes clock time in the original [7.7 (release_7.7-571-gf558105)]

2011-11-19 Thread Bernt Hansen
Consider the following org file: --8---cut here---start-8--- * Orig Task 1 SCHEDULED: 2011-11-19 Sat +1w :LOGBOOK: - Note taken on [2011-11-19 Sat 21:24] \\ foo CLOCK: [2011-11-18 Fri 20:30]--[2011-11-18 Fri 21:24] = 0:54 CLOCK: [2011-11-19 Sat