Hi!
2012/5/12 Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu:
(Henri-Paul, do you still read this list?)
Yes, I do. Still using orgmode each day.
I do not have anything fancy going on and actually would like to know
how to set up appendices for LaTeX export.
I have the following outline:
*
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz wrote:
Achim Gratz writes:
Are you trying to use an NTemacs perhaps?!
No, I'm on Windows, but I don't use anymore (for years) the customized and
patched Emacs binaries such as NTEmacs or EmacsW32.
I do only use the official binary from Gnu. Currently:
GNU Emacs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/05/12 09:35, Bastien wrote:
Hi Rainer,
Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com writes:
I would like to use a README.org file on github, and also include code
blocks in the
README.org - is this possible?
No.
To bad ...
What do I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/05/12 00:05, Neil Smithline wrote:
I've been looking at this too. I go with Bastien. Work with me to improve
org-ruby gem or
export to HTML before pushing to Git.
Hi Neil,
Unfortunately I know nothing about ruby and it would have been a
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/05/12 09:35, Bastien wrote:
Hi Rainer,
Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com writes:
I would like to use a README.org file on github, and also include code
blocks in
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz wrote:
Based on that assumption, here's another patch. Let me know if this
works in your setup.
As you can see, that *does* work... Thanks a lot, Achim!
Sebastien@MEDIACENTER:home/org-mode 0$ make autoloads
make -C lisp autoloads
make[1]: Entering directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/05/12 10:57, Puneeth Chaganti wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 19/05/12 09:35, Bastien wrote:
Hi Rainer,
Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com
Hi François and all,
François Pinard wrote:
- I was using lower case c and r, while the manual suggests
upper case C and R instead. Both seem to work (in Emacs at
least). Should the manual be amended to say that case does not
matter? If then, should the manual stick uniformly to
Henri-Paul Indiogine hindiog...@gmail.com writes:
Hi!
2012/5/12 Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu:
(Henri-Paul, do you still read this list?)
Yes, I do. Still using orgmode each day.
I do not have anything fancy going on and actually would like to know
how to set up
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/05/12 10:57, Puneeth Chaganti wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/05/12 11:57, Puneeth Chaganti wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 21/05/12 10:57, Puneeth Chaganti wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Rainer
I know about *bold*, _underline_, etc. which can be used to highlight text. This
is shown in the text itself and in the export.
Is there any other way to highlight text *within* Emacs? I'm looking for
something similar to how org-mode highlights the TODO word. I would like to, for
example,
Hi SW,
SW wrote:
I know about *bold*, _underline_, etc. which can be used to highlight text.
This is shown in the text itself and in the export.
Is there any other way to highlight text *within* Emacs? I'm looking for
something similar to how org-mode highlights the TODO word. I would like
Hello,
These last days, I've observed that, whenever creating a new Org file (to be
precise, when saving it), I'm asked:
non-existent agenda file ~/file.txt. [R]emove from list or [A]bort?
I'm then forced to answer `R' for the save to be done.
Do you see that behavior as well?
Best
Hi Puneeth,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Puneeth Chaganti puncha...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, embedding code blocks in the README does work[1][2]. You
need to use all upper case keywords, i.e., BEGIN_SRC or BEGIN_EXAMPLE
instead of begin_src or begin_example.
[1] -
John Hendy jw.he...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 7:41 PM, c b 24x7x...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have been using org-mode with emacs(23) for about a year now and love it.
However, sometime in the last couple of weeks, I did a git pull on the
master branch (and I redid the same
Note: Resend to the list; I did send this mail to bastien alone, not the
list - mea culpa.
Hi,
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Hi Rainer,
Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com writes:
I would like to use a README.org file on github, and also include code
blocks in the README.org - is this
Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu writes:
I am a graduate student in philosophy, and I am about to begin writing
my dissertation. I am wondering about whether I should write it in Org,
or stick to plain LaTeX.
I would recommend LaTeX. In my experience, writing long documents (or
On 31.3.2012, at 21:24, Stephen J. Barr wrote:
I want to make a document that has a table where one column has
variables and another column has descriptions.
| VAR NAMES | DESC |
|---+|
| =var1=| this is the first var |
| =var2=|
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Henri-Paul Indiogine
hindiog...@gmail.com wrote:
The LaTeX export of course does not know the that last chapter should
contain the appendices. I have tried to insert several LaTeX commands
in the orgmode file, but I could not make it work.
This might help:
Hi Yagnesh,
Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala h...@yagnesh.org writes:
I am getting following backtrace when exporting a file to latex (beamer
presentation). where as old exporter is working fine.
The new exporter is not ready for beamer documents yet.
This is one of the prerequisit before making the
Hi,
suvayu ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Puneeth,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Puneeth Chaganti puncha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Actually, embedding code blocks in the README does work[1][2]. You
need to use all upper case keywords, i.e., BEGIN_SRC or BEGIN_EXAMPLE
instead
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Based on that assumption, here's another patch. Let me know if this
works in your setup.
I just applied this patch, thanks.
--
Bastien
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
François Pinard pin...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
If I had to do this, I would search around to see if there is an Org to
Texinfo exporter, and then blindly / fully rely on it to do various
wonders automatically! ;-) I did not check, but presume that the
François Pinard pin...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
François Pinard pin...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
If I had to do this, I would search around to see if there is an Org to
Texinfo exporter, and then blindly / fully rely on it to do various
wonders
Sebastien Vauban
wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7...@public.gmane.org writes:
These last days, I've observed that, whenever creating a new Org file (to be
precise, when saving it), I'm asked:
non-existent agenda file ~/file.txt. [R]emove from list or [A]bort?
I'm then forced to answer
- The identifier in the left column did not work, but if I change it to
the identifier in the right column, the content highlights (in
Emacs). The manual does not list it.
| config | conf |
| email | mail |
| make | makefile |
| postscript | ps |
Hi, Org people!
A while ago, we discussed capitalization on this list, as the manual was
irregular on things like #+BEGIN_SRC and #+begin_src. After some
discussion and hesitation, Bastien decided to stick to upper case in the
manual, and despite it was not my own preference, I amended all my
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
If the real source of the manual was in Org format, and periodically and
mechanically turned into a Texinfo file, would the requirement be met?
Yes, but somebody would have to write a good texinfo exporter.
Oh! I did not even know that none exist
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Sebastien Vauban
wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7...@public.gmane.org writes:
These last days, I've observed that, whenever creating a new Org file
(to be precise, when saving it), I'm asked:
non-existent agenda file ~/file.txt. [R]emove from list or
François Pinard pin...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Sebastien Vauban
wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7...@public.gmane.org writes:
These last days, I've observed that, whenever creating a new Org file
(to be precise, when saving it), I'm asked:
François Pinard pin...@iro.umontreal.ca writes:
Hi, Org people!
A while ago, we discussed capitalization on this list, as the manual was
irregular on things like #+BEGIN_SRC and #+begin_src. After some
discussion and hesitation, Bastien decided to stick to upper case in the
manual, and
François Pinard pin...@iro.umontreal.ca writes:
I could of course modify my nit-picking program so it recognizes the
#+RESULTS: case, but my feeling is that Org should be consistent overall
on capitalization. And by telling this, of course, I disregard my own
preference. Consistency has a
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
François Pinard pin...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Sebastien Vauban
wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7...@public.gmane.org writes:
These last days, I've observed that, whenever creating a new Org file
(to be
I have attached a minimal Org Mode setup that replicates this problem. The
files are minimal-org.el and test.org. The lisp file is the minimum
configuration for org-mode and the org-file is a simplified test file.
The minimal configuration assumes:
- A working directory of ~/tmp/tags-test
Using org-babel, I cannot figure out how to make the export of the
results of execution appear in LaTeX as a shaded box, like I see on so
many of the org-mode websites.
#+name: example
#+BEGIN_SRC python -n :results output :exports both
print Hello World
#+END_SRC
#+results: example
: Hello
Hello,
François Pinard pin...@iro.umontreal.ca writes:
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.coma writes:
Assuming contrib directory is in your load-path, just evaluate
(require 'org-export)
It would be that simple? This is surely worth a try then!
Well, I'm quickly encountering a few
Aloha Jeff,
Jeff Rush jr...@taupro.com writes:
Using org-babel, I cannot figure out how to make the export of the
results of execution appear in LaTeX as a shaded box, like I see on so
many of the org-mode websites.
#+name: example
#+BEGIN_SRC python -n :results output :exports both
-Original Message-
From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+mlt=gmx...@gnu.org [mailto:emacs-orgmode-
bounces+mlt=gmx...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas S. Dye
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 12:58 PM
To: Jeff Rush
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [O] Unable to Style RESULTS Blocks
Using
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
No, org-export needs testing, and I'm ready to debug it. [...] I do
not ask you to debug anything, but, if you can provide them, ECM help
a lot. In any case, please report the problems you get with it.
[...] I think reporting to this list is
Mikhail Titov m...@gmx.us writes:
-Original Message-
From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+mlt=gmx...@gnu.org [mailto:emacs-orgmode-
bounces+mlt=gmx...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Schulte
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 5:39 PM
To: Mikhail Titov
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [O] How to
-Original Message-
From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+mlt=gmx...@gnu.org [mailto:emacs-orgmode-
bounces+mlt=gmx...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Schulte
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 5:39 PM
To: Mikhail Titov
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [O] How to get to work non-interactive
-Original Message-
From: Eric Schulte [mailto:eric.schu...@gmx.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 1:11 PM
To: Mikhail Titov
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [O] How to get to work non-interactive publishing?
...
Another weird issue I experience when batch-publishing is that
-Original Message-
From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+mlt=gmx...@gnu.org [mailto:emacs-orgmode-
bounces+mlt=gmx...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Mikhail Titov
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 4:06 PM
To: 'Eric Schulte'
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [O] How to get to work non-interactive
Hi.
Page http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/org-drill.html refers to
inexisting http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/spanish.html. There is
no spanish.org in the Org mode distribution either. Maybe here?
https://bitbucket.org/eeeickythump/org-drill/src/bc740455003b/spanish.org
François
Mikhail Titov m...@gmx.us writes:
-Original Message-
From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+mlt=gmx...@gnu.org [mailto:emacs-orgmode-
bounces+mlt=gmx...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas S. Dye
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 12:58 PM
To: Jeff Rush
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [O] Unable to
-Original Message-
From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+mlt=gmx...@gnu.org [mailto:emacs-orgmode-
bounces+mlt=gmx...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas S. Dye
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 4:40 PM
To: Mikhail Titov
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; 'Jeff Rush'
Subject: Re: [O] Unable to Style RESULTS Blocks
Laurynas Biveinis laurynas.bivei...@gmail.com writes:
I am trying to implement the following but I am not really getting
anywhere. I want to have a block in a custom agenda that lists all
archivable tasks, where archivable means in any of done states
and not in a project. In my system
(I seem to be winding up fixating on non-asciisms for org-mode;
strange)
"Smart" quotes can be annoying when they aren't smart enough.
But when they work you can miss them. I'm attaching a patch that
defines a custom variable org-smart-quotes (nil by default),
I am also experiencing strange issues with custom agenda commands
after I upgraded to 7.8.10 (not sure if from 7.8.09 - I might have
skipped a version or two).
In my case the negative tag selection stopped working in tags-todo. For example,
project-somedaymaybe/!TODO
works as if it were
2012/5/22 Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org:
So I would like to have a way to list all items in a done state where
there is no 'project' tag on it nor in any of its (indirect) parents.
Does the following work?
--8---cut here---start-8---
Hi, Org people.
GitHub has a few niceties, like easy forking, pull requests and such. I
notice https://github.com/jwiegley/org-mode in particular, which does
not seem to be itself a fork of another GitHub repository, so I presume
it forked directly from the official Git site for Org mode, which
52 matches
Mail list logo
