On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:52 PM, David Rogers
davidandrewrog...@gmail.comwrote:
Also look at ASynK, which can synchronize between Google and bbdb3:
https://karra-asynk.appspot.com/
ASynK also works with BBDB v2 with a small-ish patch that adds timestamp
support. As no one is really
Hello Aaron,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:02:21PM -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote:
Hello,
The current way that org handles LaTeX packages for export isn’t
optimal. The org-latex-(default-)packages-alist variables define a set
of packages that are loaded always. If a user wants to use advanced
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 02:36:57PM -0500, François Pinard wrote:
- Could org-sort, by default and for most of its current option letters,
sort alphabetically (or lexicographically as they say!) over the
visual aspect of the line instead of its physical contents? It might
be difficult
Tim Burt tcb...@rochester.rr.com writes:
Jeffrey Brent McBeth mcb...@broggs.org writes:
I'm trying to capture into a datetree using org-capture, but if my tree has
a tag on it (in particular noexport), then it creates a new datetree instead
of using the one I have.
Example .emacs:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I am using org-mode from git and compile it.
I would like to use the org-notmuch module in the contrib directory, and I
activate it using:
(add-to-list 'load-path ~/.emacs.d/org-mode/contrib/lisp)
(require 'org-notmuch)
But, as Suvayo
Subhan Tindall subhan.tind...@rentrakmail.com writes:
I have a question regarding a custom agenda report. I've found the
variable org-agenda-span to set the number of days shown. But, I
can't seem to some up with a way to make it start in the past.
IE I want to see all agenda items for
Subhan Tindall subhan.tindall at rentrakmail.com writes:
I have a question regarding a custom agenda report. I've found the
variable org-agenda-span to set the number of days shown. But, I
can't seem to some up with a way to make it start in the past.
IE I want to see all agenda items for
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
On 2/20/13, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote:
The basic syntax is similar to the one used by `footnote.el', i.e.
a footnote is defined in a paragraph that is started by a footnote
marker in square brackets in column 0, no indentation
Subhan: here is a fonction you can use to generate your weekly report:
#+BEGIN_SRC lisp
(defun my/weekly-report nil
Generate the agenda list for last 8 days with report mode on
(org-agenda-list nil (- (org-today) 8) 8) ; 8 day agenda starting 8
days ago
Hello,
Following a thread started by Samuel Wales (see
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/66558), it appears that
the standard way to include multiple paragraphs in a footnote definition
is to rely on \par LaTeXism.
There are two problems here. Firstly, the parser would have to go
Samuel Loury konubi...@gmail.com wrote:
╭
│ (defun my/org-last-week ()
│ (- (org-today) 7)
│ )
│
│
│ (add-to-list 'org-agenda-custom-commands
│ '(w Weekly Logs
│(
│ (agenda nil
│
Hello,
Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com writes:
The current way that org handles LaTeX packages for export isn’t
optimal. The org-latex-(default-)packages-alist variables define a set
of packages that are loaded always. If a user wants to use advanced
functionality (booktabs for nicer table
Hi!
I have a section in a document where I have to specify some DOS file paths
(yes, I /know/...).
Unfortunately, I have other stuff in the document that uses these options:
#+OPTIONS: H:3 num:t toc:nil \n:nil @:t ::t |:t ^:nil -:t f:t *:t TeX:t
LaTeX:nil skip:t d:nil tags:not-in-toc
Is
OK, I feel very silly... Blame it on switching back and forth from org-mode to
textile.
The \textbackslash escape works reasonably well in plain text. However, if I had
used the appropriate ~ instead of @ to highlight the paths, it would have
exported
correctly.
So, I needed to change this:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Samuel Loury konubi...@gmail.com wrote:
╭
│ (defun my/org-last-week ()
│ (- (org-today) 7)
│ )
│
│
│ (add-to-list 'org-agenda-custom-commands
│ '(w Weekly Logs
│ (
│
2013ko otsailak 21an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
Obviously, if you need a package in every document you write, it
should go into `org-latex-packages-alist'.
I agree with this.
If you need occasional packages, they should go into
`org-latex-classes'. Adding a new class is cheap. For
Nicolas,
I don’t know how difficult this would be in terms of the code, but would
it be possible to introduce a new syntax for multiparagraph footnotes?
Something like:
#+begin_footnote 12
This is footnote number 12.
etc.
#+end_footnote
This has the advantage that long footnote definitions
Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com writes:
Nicolas,
I don’t know how difficult this would be in terms of the code, but would
it be possible to introduce a new syntax for multiparagraph footnotes?
Something like:
#+begin_footnote 12
This is footnote number 12.
etc.
#+end_footnote
This has
E Sabof esa...@gmail.com writes:
In any case, I've updated org-bullets to use compose-region. You can
get it from here: https://github.com/sabof/org-bullets
Hi, Evgeni (and gang).
I've been trying this new org-bullets today, and I did not meet yet some
of the problems I observed before. So,
Actually I think the behavior of agendas is somewhat broken in this
regard - a 6 day span shows 6 days, an 8 day span shows 8 days, a 7
day span shows a weekly agenda starting on Monday. Silently
redefining the meaning of a variable like this depending on it's value
is pretty horrible.
But
Nicolas,
Thank you for your explanations, which were very helpful.
2013ko urtarrilak 23an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
You needn't. org-exp-blocks functionalities are supported by the new
exporter out of the box.
Can you say more about this? I looked for but did not find a
replacement to
Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com writes:
2013ko otsailak 21an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
If you need occasional packages, they should go into
`org-latex-classes'. Adding a new class is cheap. For example you can
create a class article-with-tikz. It also allows to include
arbitrary code
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
Does this allow blank lines to separate paragraphs in inline footnote
definitions?
No. Inline definitions stay inlined and as such, cannot contain blank
lines. My proposal is only about full footnote definitions.
If so, it sounds very good.
I
Thank you for asking the list.
Does this allow blank lines to separate paragraphs in inline footnote
definitions?
If so, it sounds very good.
I presume we can still do
===
1) a
b.
1) c
===
On 2/21/13, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest to end a footnote definition at
Am 24.01.2013 15:10, schrieb Bastien:
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Röhler andreas.roeh...@online.de writes:
Okay, I'll dig into.
For the moment: assume this code should not be needed,
python-mode.el should act that all. But let me have a closer look,
Great, thanks a lot!
So let's start with
Aloha all,
This link (which works correctly in the Org mode buffer):
[[info:emacs#Indirect Buffers][GNU Emacs Manual]]
exports to texinfo like this:
@ref{top,GNU Emacs Manual,,emacs#Indirect Buffers,}
when I was hoping to approximate this:
@ref{Indirect Buffers,,,emacs,GNU Emacs Manual}
Is
Hello,
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
I can't get the following macro to work:
- {{{kbd(/)}}} ~org-agenda-filter-by-tag~ ::
Here is its definition:
#+MACRO: markup @@info:@$1{@@$2@@info:}@@
#+MACRO: kbd {{{markup(kbd,$1)}}}
Sorry, I
Hi Thomas,
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
Here is a warning I don't remember seeing before, posted here in case it
is useful information:
Compiling /Users/dk/.emacs.d/src/org-mode/lisp/org.el...
In org-current-time:
org.el:5341:16:Warning: `time-to-seconds' is an obsolete function
[continues off-topic]
Have you tried a Dvorak keyboard?
A friend of mine ridicules me for being a QWERTY typist, but I have found
no empirical evidence that it is actually superior. At best, it has been
proven, in /some/ studies, to be /slightly/ superior; and from a
cost-benefit standpoint,
Hi,
I have a problem with htmlize.
I'm running the very latest trunk version of org-mode.
If I write an src block code with :
#+begin_src java
...
#+end_src
I get htmlized output.
But it does not work with :
#+include: foo.java java
Any obvious reason for this ?
Thanks for any help,
--
Hello Tom,
On 21 February 2013 15:09, Thomas S. Dye t...@tsdye.com wrote:
Aloha all,
This link (which works correctly in the Org mode buffer):
[[info:emacs#Indirect Buffers][GNU Emacs Manual]]
exports to texinfo like this:
@ref{top,GNU Emacs Manual,,emacs#Indirect Buffers,}
when I was
Hello Tom,
On 20 February 2013 19:45, Thomas S. Dye t...@tsdye.com wrote:
Aloha all,
I can't figure out how to get the detailed node listing formatted
correctly, so I want to call this a bug. An example shows the problem:
* Hacking::How to hack your way around
*
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
I don't understand what you mean with can't get it to work. What
doesn't work?
When I expand this macro, I obtain the following:
@@info:@kbd{@@/@@info:}@@
What would be expected instead?
This works now. It must have been fixed in one of the
Hi Jon,
Jonathan Leech-Pepin jonathan.leechpe...@gmail.com writes:
Hello Tom,
On 20 February 2013 19:45, Thomas S. Dye t...@tsdye.com wrote:
Aloha all,
I can't figure out how to get the detailed node listing formatted
correctly, so I want to call this a bug. An example shows the
#+include: foo.java java
Any obvious reason for this ?
The reason is really obvious... and to my great shame,
I already asked for something similar a couple of months ago.
#+include: foo.java SRC java
I keep finding old blocks without this src keyword.
Sorry for the noise,
Fabrice
Hello list,
There are about 25 lines of what looks like function or filter names
under the heading of FIXME in ox-html.el.
Does anyone know if these are features handled by the old exporter but
not yet by the new one, goals for new functionality, or something else?
Do these need to be resolved
Hi,
I know C-u C-c C-v t tangles current code block only, even if there are
other code blocks that have the same tangle file name. Isn't it
counterintuitive? It makes more sense that this command tangles all the
code blocks that belongs to the same file, in my opinion. Any other ideas?
Thanks,
Hi Bastien,
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
I'm not sure if simply changing the max version parameter in
install.rdf in fireforg.xpi is the best idea.
Maybe -- can you try and tell?
I can change it to 18.0.1, and even though it installs, it reads Error
in the add-on/status bar. I just guess
38 matches
Mail list logo
