Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
The think that comes to mind is `show-all'. In my Emacs:
(define-obsolete-function-alias
'show-all 'outline-show-all 25.1)
Ah right. That's the same idea. Functions without a namespace are being
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
So when can we target Emacs 24? Jessie? My Debian Squeeze VM has 23.4.1.
CentOS 7 is already on Emacs 24.3.
Org 8.4 will drop support for Emacs 23, i.e., as soon as Org 8.3 is
released, we can activate lexical binding on master.
Regards,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
What is the rational behind Org 8.3 has Emacs 23 support; Org 8.4 does
not. I'm just trying to understand. . .
Easy: 8.3 ends with a 3, like Emacs 23...
Org 8.3 is close from being released. It started with Emacs 23 support,
a long time ago, so it would make
From: Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr
Cc: Damian Nadales damian.nada...@asml.com, 19...@debbugs.gnu.org, Nicolas
Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:20:15 +0100
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org writes:
From: Damian Nadales damian.nada...@asml.com
That's
Sebastien Vauban sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@public.gmane.org
writes:
I still consider the default behavior as dangerous -- because the novice
is not aware (except if obvious) that some clock times may be dropped in
the computation, and I find that scary --, but thanks anyway for the
From: Damian Nadales damian.nada...@asml.com
CC: 19...@debbugs.gnu.org 19...@debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:32:12 +
I cannot reproduce this. I tried both Emacs 24.4 and the pretest of 24.5.
In
both cases, Emacs asks me whether to kill a buffer that is modified, and
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org writes:
From: Damian Nadales damian.nada...@asml.com
That's weird. Which buffer are you killing, the Org buffer, or the
new buffer that is created when pressing C-c ' inside the source
block? Is the latter the one I cannot kill.
There was no C-c ' in the recipe you
Melanie Bacou m...@mbacou.com writes:
You're right with Github or remote storages there's no problem (links
to images like `./fig/my_fig.png` or local CSS or JS
`./css/my_css_.css` are interpreted as usual. The problem is only on
cloud storage services like Dropbox where each resource gets a
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
What do you mean by outline prefixes?
The think that comes to mind is `show-all'. In my Emacs:
(define-obsolete-function-alias
'show-all 'outline-show-all 25.1)
—Rasmus
--
There are known knowns; there are things we know that we
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
The think that comes to mind is `show-all'. In my Emacs:
(define-obsolete-function-alias
'show-all 'outline-show-all 25.1)
Ah right. That's the same idea. Functions without a namespace are being
renamed.
Regards,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
(define-obsolete-function-alias
'show-all 'outline-show-all 25.1)
Ah right. That's the same idea. Functions without a namespace are being
renamed.
My Debian Squeeze VM has 23.4.1.
^^
Wheezy that is
Actually, Debian 7.8 has a Emacs
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Org 8.4 will drop support for Emacs 23, i.e., as soon as Org 8.3 is
released, we can activate lexical binding on master.
What is the rational behind Org 8.3 has Emacs 23 support; Org 8.4 does
not. I'm just trying to understand. . .
—Rasmus
--
On 2015-02-20T18:32:12+1100, Damian Nadales said:
DN That's weird. Which buffer are you killing, the DN Org
buffer, or the new buffer that is created when pressing C-c ' DN
inside the source block? Is the latter the one I cannot kill.
DN I've only installed packages through the emacs DN
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
PS: Is that also why the outline prefixes are being added? It complains
about it when you compile org.
What do you mean by outline prefixes?
Regards,
If I'm creating an org file in a buffer which has source blocks for, say,
Lisp, then I can run these blocks of Lisp code and Babel will fill in the
answer just below in my buffer. Good. As advertised. But what is really
happening to this code? Does Babel invoke a Lisp REPL once, do the code,
print
PMJI, but at
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/95159,
Nicolas Goaziou said This should be fixed.
Perhaps this bug report can simply be closed then ?
If it's fixed, please close it.
[Damian Nadales]
Thanks for the fix.
I must add that I discovered the bug by accident.
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
I can move the call to Emacs as file variable s.t.
# Local Variables:
# eval: (unless (or user-init-file (window-system)) (load-file
conf.el))
# End:
A much better variable to check is `noninteractive', cf
(info (elisp) Batch mode).
Ideally,
Hi Eli,
[Damian Nadales]
That's weird. Which buffer are you killing, the Org buffer, or the new
buffer
that is created when pressing C-c ' inside the source block? Is the latter the
one I cannot kill.
There was no C-c ' in the recipe you posted.
[Damian Nadales]
No, it wasn't. Sorry
I think it saves state, and remembers what has been done, at least as
long as emacs is open. If you close emacs, it will forget everything,
and you would have to rerun each block. You could tangle (or selectively
tangle) the blocks out, to get an emacs-lisp file, which might then be a
library you
Claudius Mueller writes:
if I load a theme (such as zenburn) and then rebuild my agenda -
the time table has changed: (i) the sorting of time is reversed,
and (ii) tasks that were inline before are now sorted out of the
time table (see arrow in both pictures).
I do not use zenburn very
hi rasmus,
On 2/20/15, Rasmus ras...@gmx.us wrote:
I think everybody is thinking along the lines, but some people want to not
have another link-morass :) In particular, I think we are trying hard to
avoid this situation:
i just think the syntax we design should, if possible, be so
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
basically, i am concerned about syntax creep in the big picture and
its downstream consequences. for example, it's more efficient to
support, and for the user to remember, a single general syntax than a
whole bunch of special syntaxes.
For the record, attached are the files for the ECM I used to test.
-L
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 07:27:18PM -0800, Linus Arver wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 06:36:29PM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Linus Arver linusar...@gmail.com writes:
When I call
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 06:36:29PM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Linus Arver linusar...@gmail.com writes:
When I call org-publish-current-project, the included file's TAB
characters automatically become converted into spaces. Is there an
orgmode way of preventing this
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Hello,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Ideally, what I would like would be to specify a per-file/project init
file. Sort of like org-export-async-init-file, but as part of
org-export-options-alist to get the init.el-dependency inside the
Hello,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Ideally, what I would like would be to specify a per-file/project init
file. Sort of like org-export-async-init-file, but as part of
org-export-options-alist to get the init.el-dependency inside the
Org-file. It would be read when Org exports async or
Hi Melanie,
Melanie Bacou m...@mbacou.com writes:
Just want to point out RMarkdown/Pandoc implementation of
bibliographies and citations here
http://rmarkdown.rstudio.com/authoring_bibliographies_and_citations.html
Thanks for joining the discussion! Actually, the Pandoc/RMarkdown
syntax was
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Can't you simply set-up a publishing project?
No this has the same issue as the Makefile. It's not as easy as latex.
Setting up a publishing project is easy and well documented.
I want *one* coherent file with all the necessary instructions, that can
be edited
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
AFAICT, the most advanced use of citations is Thomas', and he is
basically only using subtype. So I'm pretty confident that 99.9% of
users will be fine with only these subtypes.
...
Again, I don't think we need {:key val} at the
Does this answer your question?
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-lisp.html#sec-3-2
I usually set up Scheme and R to keep a single buffer around with
Racket or R running in them. I do work in there outside of org just
like I do inside of org; figure stuff out and rely on
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
No this has the same issue as the Makefile. It's not as easy as latex.
Setting up a publishing project is easy and well documented.
So is Makefile.
I want *one* coherent file with all the necessary instructions, that can
be edited in
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
emacs --batch -Q -l conf.el --visit toexport.org -f org-latex-export-to-pdf
That it hardcodes conf.el. So it doesn't toexport1.org which depends on
config/conf.el. I want to specify the dependency in in toexport.org
explicitly so that
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
How to I generalize this to a emacs --batch call from a random org
file?
What's wrong with
emacs --batch -Q -l conf.el --visit toexport.org -f org-latex-export-to-pdf
Regards,
Ben yfefyf at gmail.com writes:
You can download the corresponding dlls from ezwinports [fn:1] and
put them into emacs's `bin` directory.
There are some instructions in the Image support part on page [fn:2].
[fn:2] https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/
Strangely, the instructions and
On 2/20/15, Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu wrote:
If there are others (John? Aaron? Samuel?) who think they really need
the {:key val} syntax *over and above* a subtype designation, please
speak up!
i have no comments on citations per se. i just think the syntax we
design
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
if everybody is already thinking along the same lines, great.
I think everybody is thinking along the lines, but some people want to not
have another link-morass :) In particular, I think we are trying hard to
avoid this situation:
i just think the
36 matches
Mail list logo
