On 2015-04-27 20:46, Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Set-up (e.g., link abbreviations) is not refreshed after expanding
INCLUDE keywords. I cannot remember why, tho. Maybe for (dubious)
efficiency reasons.
If you don't remember, may be it would be possible to try it out?
Hello,
Yes you are right, i digged deeper in the problem and it seems to be
that the cond:
(cond ((org-face-from-face-or-color
'priority nil
(cdr (assoc p org-priority-faces
((and (listp org-agenda-fontify-priorities)
Hello,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
I'm copying Nicolas -- Nicolas, is there a process for inclusion in
contrib? Would this be eligible? I'll just stick it in Elpa,
otherwise.
Any package is eligible.
However, contrib/ is from pre-package.el days. Nowadays, I tend to
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Hi Eric,
I added some functions in the attachment. they colorize the comments,
add an org-comment menu to the org-menu, and some functions for pop to
and delete comments from
Thanks very much Oleh.
Best,
Zhihao
On 28 Apr 2015, at 08:22, Oleh Krehel ohwoeo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Zhihao,
I’ve got a simple question: how to speed up jumping
between code blocks?
You might be interested in https://github.com/abo-abo/worf.
It allows you to traverse anything
Using the tabulate python module it is possible to have the following
inline workaround:
8888888
#+BEGIN_SRC python :results raw
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from tabulate import tabulate
df
Hello,
I don't understand why the 2 screenshots I added on Worg (in the
following section of `org-hacks.org') do not appear in the browser:
--8---cut here---start-8---
*** Where can I find nice themes for HTML export?
You can find great looking HTML themes
Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
*None* of the complexity is in the format itself: if you unloaded
org-comment, the comment links would be perfectly human-readable. All of
the complexity is in helper functions for manipulating them. I suppose
it would be possible to
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Would this be eligible?
Not that my .02€ are worth much, but I think the idea of inline notes is
good, but I don't think it should be done using links. See e.g. the
discussion on citation which introduced a
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Hello,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
I'm copying Nicolas -- Nicolas, is there a process for inclusion in
contrib? Would this be eligible? I'll just stick it in Elpa,
otherwise.
Any package is eligible.
However, contrib/
stephen's mailinglist account stephen4mailinglists at gmail.com writes:
I have tried Freemind export via ox-freemind and this seems to work well
and opens the file in Docear (derived from Freemind/jabref). I wondered if
anyone knew of any translation tools to come in the opposite
Hi,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Just to be clear, you think it fits into the category of
incubation-prior-to-core?
I think inlinetasks/comments that are actually *inline* would be nice!
If anyone thinks that this mechanism warrants actual new Org syntax, I'd
be happy to
On Wednesday, 29 Apr 2015 at 11:47, Fabrice Niessen wrote:
Hello,
I don't understand why the 2 screenshots I added on Worg (in the
following section of `org-hacks.org') do not appear in the browser:
Because the files are not there? Going to
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Would this be eligible?
Not that my .02€ are worth much, but I think the idea of inline notes is
good, but I don't think it should be done using links. See e.g. the
discussion on citation which introduced a [cite:⋯] command. A [comment:⋯]
Michal Koval koval.m...@gmail.com writes:
I see `(defface org-block' in org-faces.el and I see it used it in org.el
`org-fontify-meta-lines-and-blocks-1' where the bug probably is.
`org-block' face is used for verbatim blocks (e.g, example block) and
src blocks without a language specified. If
Hello,
A link in a caption:
#+CAPTION: [[link]]
Initially receives org-link face when I type it. After some action (moving
to the next line or saving the buffer), it is redrawn with org-block face.
In neither case does [[ and ]] receive the invisibility attribute typically
given to links.
In
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Yup, annotation mechanism is about right. Just to be clear, you think
it fits into the category of incubation-prior-to-core?
I think so.
If anyone thinks that this mechanism warrants actual new Org syntax, I'd
be happy to work on implementing
Renato Ferreira renatof...@gmail.com writes:
Yes you are right, i digged deeper in the problem and it seems to be
that the cond:
(cond ((org-face-from-face-or-color
'priority nil
(cdr (assoc p org-priority-faces
((and (listp
Hello,
Luke Amdor luke.am...@gmail.com writes:
Subject: [PATCH] org.el: Fix use of org-open-at-point with shell and midnight
cleaning
* lisp/org.el (org-open-at-point): Make sure org shell output buffer
is a string of buffer name before appending to
`clean-buffer-list-kill-buffer-names'
I have took in consideration all of your points, is it better now?
The current patch doesn't overwrite the present behavior of
org-set-timer it only add the possibility to use hh:mm:ss format.
2015-04-24 18:49 GMT+02:00 Kyle Meyer k...@kyleam.com:
Brice Waegenire brice@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Jacob Gerlach jacobgerl...@gmail.com writes:
A link in a caption:
#+CAPTION: [[link]]
Initially receives org-link face when I type it.
I cannot reproduce this.
After some action (moving to the next line or saving the buffer), it
is redrawn with org-block face.
I can't remember
Patch is attached. I was running into this when I'd run a shell script
through an org link and later a clean-buffers would run. Thanks!
0001-org.el-Fix-use-of-org-open-at-point-with-shell-and-m.patch
Description: Binary data
Hello all,
I have been following this whole thread with great interest, having
posted very early on the use of inline tasks as a solution for the OP.
I use inline tasks a lot for both annotations and for TODO tasks when
writing papers. I like the link syntax proposed but would much prefer
I think it could benefit from a dedicated syntax in the following
context:
There are different types of annotation you might like, e.g. delete,
insert, replace, comment (I am drawing from ideas of annotations in PDF,
and the idea of track changes). In multi-author documents you might want
to know
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Would this be eligible?
Not that my .02€ are worth much, but I think the idea of inline notes is
good, but I don't think it should be done using links. See e.g. the
discussion on
Eric S Fraga writes:
Hello all,
I have been following this whole thread with great interest, having
posted very early on the use of inline tasks as a solution for the OP.
I use inline tasks a lot for both annotations and for TODO tasks when
writing papers. I like the link syntax proposed
You have num:2, so subsubsections are not TOC'ed, so they don't get
the alternative. If you set it to 3, all should work.
That is what we have been discussing. There are situations where you
do not want a headline to appear in TOC, but still want the ALT_TITLE
used. It is now
On Wednesday, 29 Apr 2015 at 20:34, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
[...]
Yup, annotation mechanism is about right. Just to be clear, you think
it fits into the category of incubation-prior-to-core?
[...]
Now I wish we'd named it org-annotate.
Is it too late? Simple refactoring of the code?
I
Rasmus writes:
Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
*None* of the complexity is in the format itself: if you unloaded
org-comment, the comment links would be perfectly human-readable. All of
the complexity is in helper functions for manipulating them. I suppose
it
On Wednesday, 29 Apr 2015 at 10:00, John Kitchin wrote:
[...]
There is in org-comment a command `org-comment-display-comments' which
will generate a buffer you can see all the comments in, and from that
pop to a comment, delete it, etc...
Ah, thanks. That's good.
--
: Eric S Fraga
Brice Waegenire brice@gmail.com wrote:
I have took in consideration all of your points, is it better now?
The current patch doesn't overwrite the present behavior of
org-set-timer it only add the possibility to use hh:mm:ss format.
Thanks.
From 8d6e379f3ed432511c613a0cf40804d2de1764b8
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Yup, annotation mechanism is about right. Just to be clear, you think
it fits into the category of incubation-prior-to-core?
I think so.
If anyone thinks that this mechanism warrants actual new
Can't figure this out from the org mode manual.
I want to use org mode for doing math assignments. This will be a lot
easier than using latex directly, I think. But, I want to use numbered
lists in org mode, and often there are multiple paragraphs that belong
under one list item.
I want to be
I would like to number only a single subset of subheadings in an html
export, so that, e.g.,
* Introduction
lorem ipsum
* Coiurse Requirements
lorem ipsum
* Course Outline
** Introduction
some long multi paragraph text.
** Origins of the French Revolution
more text. Readings.
** Liberty,
On 04/29/15 12:26 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Michal Koval koval.m...@gmail.com writes:
I see `(defface org-block' in org-faces.el and I see it used it in org.el
`org-fontify-meta-lines-and-blocks-1' where the bug probably is.
`org-block' face is used for verbatim blocks (e.g, example block)
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Hi,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Just to be clear, you think it fits into the category of
incubation-prior-to-core?
I think inlinetasks/comments that are actually *inline* would be nice!
If anyone thinks that this mechanism warrants actual
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
On Wednesday, 29 Apr 2015 at 20:34, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
[...]
Yup, annotation mechanism is about right. Just to be clear, you think
it fits into the category of incubation-prior-to-core?
[...]
Now I wish we'd named it org-annotate.
Is it too
Hello,
Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org writes:
Does this mean that #+INCLUDE is now a superset of #+SETUPFILE (I've had
some cases where I needed to do both)?
No, it isn't.
INCLUDE are expanded only during export. SETUPFILE are read whenever you
open a document or use C-c C-c on
38 matches
Mail list logo
