[O] [PATCH] org-attach.el: fix check for git annex

* lisp/org-attach.el (org-attach-commit): Check for .git/annex dir in addition to annex dir in root git dir to ensure that git annex is used --- lisp/org-attach.el | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lisp/org-attach.el b/lisp/org-attach.el index 1737ec1..7f61910 1

Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org

On 2015-05-16 Sat 12:00, Rasmus wrote: > Hi Titus, > > Titus von der Malsburg writes: > >> just tried the patch and while I still find it weird to change the >> meaning of RET, this solution doesn’t get in my way as much as the >> previous solution did. > > Try to: > > (with-temp-buffer (org-

Re: [O] [patch] org-delete-indentation

Rasmus writes: > Due to recent controversy about Org being lacking Microsoftesque detail I > finally implemented org-delete-indentation, which is a function I have > been missing forever. Updated patch attached. It now uses (org-fix-tags-on-the-fly). A consequence of this is that (i) it works

Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org

Hi Titus, Titus von der Malsburg writes: > just tried the patch and while I still find it weird to change the > meaning of RET, this solution doesn’t get in my way as much as the > previous solution did. Try to: (with-temp-buffer (org-mode) (describe-mode)). A lot of keys have been orgifi

Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org

Hi Rasmus, just tried the patch and while I still find it weird to change the meaning of RET, this solution doesn’t get in my way as much as the previous solution did. One minor cosmetic issue: * TODO foo bar :test: When I RET between foo and bar

[O] [patch] org-delete-indentation

Hi, Due to recent controversy about Org being lacking Microsoftesque detail I finally implemented org-delete-indentation, which is a function I have been missing forever. It only behaves differently from delete-indentation at headlines where it add stuff to the headline text. It is at least what

Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org

Hi, Thanks for the comments. Nicolas Goaziou writes: > "RET breaks headline text" may be more accurate. OK. >> + (let* ((context (if org-return-follows-link (org-element-context) >> +(org-element-at-point))) >> + (type (org-element-type context))) >> +(cond >> +

Re: [O] org-babel for prolog

No worries. I can wait. Thanks again for your efforts. On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Bjarte Johansen < bjarte.johan...@infomedia.uib.no> wrote: > > On 16 May 2015, at 15:00, Lawrence Bottorff wrote: > > I'm just a Prolog beginner, but this: > > #+begin_src prolog > edge(a,b). > edge(a,e). > e

Re: [O] org-babel for prolog

I'm just a Prolog beginner, but this: #+begin_src prolog edge(a,b). edge(a,e). edge(b,d). edge(b,c). edge(c,a). edge(e,b). tedge(Node1,Node2) :- edge(Node1,SomeNode), edge(SomeNode,Node2). #+end_src keeps giving me this: executing Prolog code block... executing Prolog source code

Re: [O] ob-rec.el

On 05/15/2015 11:07 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: Charles Millar writes: It appears that ob-rec.el is in org-mode - somewhere - because when I evaluate #+begin_src rec :data Testrec2.rec #+end_src the output in the is no org-babel execute function for rec However once I add (rec . t) to my org

Re: [O] Bug: org-set-tags duplicates tags in org-tag-persistent-alist

Paul Rankin writes: > I'm on the Org ELPA version, which appears to get updated a few times > a month. How far apart are they? Very far away. > If the alleged bug has been fixed in the development branch, is it > worth then finding and merging with stable? I don't think it is totally fixed, bu

Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org

Hello, Rasmus writes: > The attached patch re-enables breaks in region four of > org-complex-heading-regexp, i.e. from the cookie up to tags. A quick test > suggests it works nicely. Thank you. > WDYT? Some comments follow. > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] org.el: RET works in headline text > > * org