[O] call_*() is not working inside #+DATE

The following used to work for me in the past: #+NAME: date #+BEGIN_SRC sh :results silent :exports results :tangle no date #+END_SRC #+TITLE: Sample #+AUTHOR: Me #+DATE: call_date() and I saw the output of the shell command "date" when exporting the file to LaTeX.

Re: [O] koma letter export receiver address

Hi Rasmus, Thanks for your help. Here's my .emacs: #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp (require 'org) (add-to-list 'load-path "~/.emacs.d/lisp/vendor/org-mode/contrib/lisp") (require 'ox-koma-letter) #+END_SRC M-x org-version produces: Org-mode version 8.3.3 (release_8.3.3-640-g2b3c72

Re: [O] How to export casual letter without from and to address?

Thank you very much Eric S Fraga, H. Dieter Wilhelm, Marcin Borkowski, Nick Dokos and Rasmus for helping me with this! I finally took Nick Dokos's approach, and solved the problem! Here's what I did that worked: 1. In my .emacs, I added: #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp (add-to-list 'org-latex-classes

[O] org-babel C math.h issue

Hi, I'm a new org user, and I'm sorry if I'm missing something obvious. When executing a C code snippet with org-babel, that contains a math function, I get the famous "undefined reference" errors. I tried adding ":flags -lm", but that doesn't help. Looking at the code, it seems the -lm flag is

Re: [O] Orgtbl: edit table like code, in a separate buffer?

Hi Rafael On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Rafael Ramirez Morales wrote: > I was wondering if it was technically possible to invoke a separate buffer > to edit a table in org mode. > > My working scenario is a table with several columns with limited width so as >

Re: [O] Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

On 2016-03-02, at 22:20, Rasmus wrote: >> Fair enough. Do you have a proposal for deeply nested headlines (or >> items)? > > Use this header: > > #+options: h:0 > #+latex_header: \usepackage{enumitem} > #+latex_header: \setlistdepth{9} > #+latex_header:

Re: [O] Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

Nick Dokos writes: > Sorry, I missed your suggestion. If it has to be anywhere, I thought > what I suggested was the most natural place (I took a look at your > suggestion and I still have a slight preference for "Header and > Sectioning"), but I'm not doing the work: feel free

Re: [O] Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

Rasmus writes: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Rasmus writes: >>> I don’t think we need to do anything. >>> >>> Don't do anything? OK, done. >>> If we wanted to support

Re: [O] Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

Nick Dokos writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Rasmus writes: >> >>> I don’t think we need to do anything. >> >> Don't do anything? OK, done. >> >>> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate >>>

Re: [O] koma letter export receiver address

York Zhao writes: > Dear org-mode koma letter developers, > > I just noticed that when using org koma letter export, the receiver's address > has been moved from left side to page center. Is this the new default or an > introduced bug? If it's the new default, how do I

Re: [O] How to export casual letter without from and to address?

York Zhao writes: > Hi list, > > I've been wondering for a while that when using org-mode to write letters, how > do you export casual a letter that doesn't have from address and to address? If you really, really want to use ox-koma-letter couldn't you just set the

Re: [O] How to export casual letter without from and to address?

Marcin Borkowski writes: > On 2016-03-05, at 19:56, Eric S Fraga wrote: > >> On Saturday, 5 Mar 2016 at 10:47, York Zhao wrote: Why use a letter exporter (koma?) if you don't want something that looks like a letter? >>> >>> I wanted it to be a

Re: [O] Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Rasmus writes: > >> I don’t think we need to do anything. > > Don't do anything? OK, done. > >> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate >> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse

Re: [O] Example of Make file for Org Mode LaTeX to pdf

On Friday, 4 Mar 2016 at 23:43, Robert Love wrote: > Does anyone have a make file example that has emacs load an .org file, > process it into LaTeX and export as PDF, all from the command line > without the user doing anything more than type ‘make’? All examples > appreciated. I don't a

Re: [O] Example of Make file for Org Mode LaTeX to pdf

* Export org-files using a Makefile #+BEGIN_SRC makefile :tangle Makefile pdf: rm -f make-org.pdf emacs -batch make-org.org -f org-latex-export-to-pdf open make-org.pdf #+END_SRC works for me. Robert Love writes: > Does anyone have a make file example that has emacs

Re: [O] Example of Make file for Org Mode LaTeX to pdf

Hello Bob, Robert Love writes: > Does anyone have a make file example that has emacs load an .org file, > process it into LaTeX and export as PDF, all from the command line > without the user doing anything more than type ‘make’? All examples > appreciated. Fraid I don't have a makefile but

[O] Example of Make file for Org Mode LaTeX to pdf

Does anyone have a make file example that has emacs load an .org file, process it into LaTeX and export as PDF, all from the command line without the user doing anything more than type ‘make’? All examples appreciated. — Bob Love "Insisting on perfect safety is for people

Re: [O] How to export casual letter without from and to address?

York Zhao writes: >> Yeah, this works really convenient and near automatic, I'm also using org for >> corporate meeting minutes, reports and statistics to the tax authority >> (besides Koma letters of course ;-) > > Same here, using org-mode for everything. But have you