Re: [O] ``make test'' failure

Thank you! On Nov 3, 2017 17:17, "Nicolas Goaziou" wrote: Hello, Nick Dokos writes: > Yes, indeed: the test passes here with the patch. I merged the updated test in master branch. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] References: simplifying org mode usage for Bibtex files

You might look into the lentic package. It might be possible to view a bib file in two views, one in Bibtex mode for the entries, and one in org-mode for the comments. In the bibtex view, the org narrative would be in comment form, and in the org view the bibtex entries would be in source blocks.

[O] References: simplifying org mode usage for Bibtex files

My need is for a simple work flow/usage of Orgmode to annotate and organize existing BibTex *.bib files. I have mentioned on this list that I had found Cb2Bib to work extremely well for, so to speak, harvesting references from Google Scholar. In fact, Pere Constans, developer of Cb2Bib, recently

Re: [O] C++ sessions for Babel with cling interpreter

Hello Garjola: I have not used C++ source blocks, but I use them frequently with Javascript and Python, and I don't use sessions. The thing is, for literate programming, we want to include the code from one source block in others, and it would seem that sessions are the solution. However, I find

Re: [O] function for inserting a block

On 11/05/17 10:06 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> From 055af9e9545947b9aeccc3370c8b67a237eea5d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Eric Abrahamsen >> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:55:29 -0700 >> Subject: [PATCH]

[O] C++ sessions for Babel with cling interpreter

Hi all, I use C++ source code blocks in babel frequently and I am very happy with the results. As C++ is a compiled language, ob-C.el does not support sessions. Unfortunately, this breaks a little my litterate programming workflow, since I don't know how to use small code snippets without

Re: [O] (setq org-html-with-latex nil) is ignored

> Hello, > Uwe Brauer writes: > "org-mime.el" hard-codes it at line 379: > https://github.com/org-mime/org-mime/blob/master/org-mime.el#L379 Ah ok, thanks > You may want to report it upstream. I did. Regards Uwe

Re: [O] function for inserting a block

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:24 AM Kaushal Modi wrote: > This is a breaking change though (org-try-structure-completion doesn't > exist any more.. it breaks at least my config.. could be breaking more). > It could actually be a wider breakage as it changes the structure of

Re: [O] function for inserting a block

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:07 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > > > From 055af9e9545947b9aeccc3370c8b67a237eea5d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Eric Abrahamsen > > Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017

Re: [O] function for inserting a block

Hello, Eric Abrahamsen writes: > From 055af9e9545947b9aeccc3370c8b67a237eea5d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Eric Abrahamsen > Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:55:29 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] Replace easy templates with org-insert-structure-template

Re: [O] Shouldn't org-back-to-heading skip inline tasks ?

Am 04.11.2017 um 22:15 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: Use `org-with-limited-levels' macro to ignore inlinetasks, e.g.: (org-with-limited-levels (org-back-to-heading)) This is how Org somewhat handles inlinetasks. /me closes the can of worms. Regards, Good enough for me too. Thanx ! Best