Hello,
"numbch...@gmail.com" writes:
> Off the topic, I'm curious what is the `:session` in `ob-shell` ?
it basically means that state is preserved for code blocks that run in
the same session (as long as the interpreter is running). Or in other
words, imagine two code
Off the topic, I'm curious what is the `:session` in `ob-shell` ?
[stardiviner] GPG key ID: 47C32433
IRC(freeenode): stardiviner Twitter: @numbchild
Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36 CB99 B8C4 B8E5 47C3 2433
Blog: http://stardiviner.github.io/
On
Hi,
I have the following in my custom block agenda to sort for work tags that
are in progress:
(tags-todo "@work+TODO=\"IN-PROGRESS\""
((org-agenda-overriding-header "\nIn progress
tasks\n-\n")))
(tags-todo "@work/IN-PROGRESS"
((org-agenda-overriding-header "\nIn progress
# not an Emacs bug
tags 18617 notabug
close 18617
quit
Kaushal Modi writes:
> A quick look at the code shows that it pollutes the namespace with
> undeclared and un-let-bound variables like "tag" (and there could be
> more like that).
>
> If we investigate further, we
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 6:16 PM Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
>
> AFAICT, there is no place in the manual that explains what is the
> RESULTS keyword
OK, may be that's the first step :)
and under what circumstances it could be useful to write
> it manually.
>
No, I wasn't
Hello,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Thursday, 16 Nov 2017 at 22:40, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Eric S Fraga writes:
>>
>>> The proper solution would be to update ob-gnuplot to change the working
>>> directory at every invocation of gnuplot to be
Kaushal Modi writes:
> Regarding the earlier point I made about data safety, should we mention in
> the manual that a user must always leave a blank line after #+RESULTS,
> especially if they have one of these following the #+RESULTS: keyword?
>
> (drawer example-block
Hello,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Monday, 27 Nov 2017 at 17:48, Berry, Charles wrote:
>> This happens when `org-babel-src-block-names' calls `org-next-block'
>> calls `org-show-context'.
>
> Thanks. Was it always thus? It would be nice to have the visibility go
> back to
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:36 PM Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
> Yes, I simply forgot to add the `example-block' type. Now fixed. Thank
> you.
>
Thanks.
Regarding the earlier point I made about data safety, should we mention in
the manual that a user must always leave a blank
Hello,
Kaushal Modi writes:
> Or may be just do this:
>
> diff --git a/lisp/ob-core.el b/lisp/ob-core.el
> index 00f0fe33ecf..f04392a96d2 100644
> --- a/lisp/ob-core.el
> +++ b/lisp/ob-core.el
> @@ -2465,7 +2465,7 @@ in the buffer."
> (if (memq (org-element-type
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:58 PM Kaushal Modi wrote:
> I think that this behavior is on a safe side and good, but there needs to
> be a way for Org to figure out if the stuff following #+RESULTS is safe to
> delete..
>
> Can be probably have #+begin_results and
Hello,
This issue is at the opposite spectrum of the previous issue where the Org
element after #+RESULTS got overwritten..
Here's a MWE:
=
#+TITLE: Results with #+begin_example/#+end_example do not get overwritten
#+PROPERTY: header-args:python :exports both :results output
#+BEGIN_SRC
Hello,
Ruy Exel writes:
> With the new implementation, is it possible to insert a column to the
> left of the first column?
I assume this is done with M-S- followed with M-.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Thierry Banel writes:
> On 28/11/2017 18:08, Roger Mason wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Roger Mason writes:
>
> It compiles fine:
>
> c++ -std=c++11 -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -lginac
> C-src-1053hn1.cpp
>
Hi Nicolas,
With the new implementation, is it possible to insert a column to the
left of the first column?
Best,
Ruy
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ruy Exel writes:
>
>> This is indeed a good idea as it mimics
On 28/11/2017 18:08, Roger Mason wrote:
Hello,
Roger Mason writes:
It compiles fine:
c++ -std=c++11 -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -lginac
C-src-1053hn1.cpp
Solved by setting:
(setq org-babel-C++-compiler "c++")
> On Nov 27, 2017, at 11:54 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> On Monday, 27 Nov 2017 at 17:48, Berry, Charles wrote:
>> This happens when `org-babel-src-block-names' calls `org-next-block'
>> calls `org-show-context'.
>
> Thanks. Was it always thus?
No. In 8.0.7 (and
Hello,
Roger Mason writes:
> It compiles fine:
>
> c++ -std=c++11 -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -lginac
> C-src-1053hn1.cpp
Solved by setting:
(setq org-babel-C++-compiler "c++")
I don't recall having had to do this before.
Phew! Very glad to have this working again.
Hello,
"Francis J. Monari, Esquire" writes:
> I sent an email with a question regarding the alignment of drawers with
> the immediately preceding headline.
>
> The "problem" is still occurring, however, the "problem" is resolved
> after I run the org-lint utility on the
All,
I sent an email with a question regarding the alignment of drawers with
the immediately preceding headline.
The "problem" is still occurring, however, the "problem" is resolved
after I run the org-lint utility on the file. Note that running
org-lint fixed the "problem" not only with the
Hello,
Michael Welle writes:
> Hello Eric,
>
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> On Tuesday, 28 Nov 2017 at 13:23, Michael Welle wrote:
>>> I think that last one is what one would expect ;). Anyways, using sessions,
>>> is there a way to get rid off of the
Hello Eric,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Tuesday, 28 Nov 2017 at 13:23, Michael Welle wrote:
>> I think that last one is what one would expect ;). Anyways, using sessions,
>> is there a way to get rid off of the shell's continuation prompts?
>
> PS2=""
>
> in the shell script?
On Tuesday, 28 Nov 2017 at 13:23, Michael Welle wrote:
> I think that last one is what one would expect ;). Anyways, using sessions,
> is there a way to get rid off of the shell's continuation prompts?
PS2=""
in the shell script?
--
Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50, Org release_9.1.3-168-g7455f4
Hello,
this code block:
#+BEGIN_SRC shell :session n42 :shebang "#!/bin/bash"
for i in "aa" "bb" "cc" ; do
echo "u: $i"
done
#+end_src
produces this output when it first runs:
#+RESULTS:
|||||
| > | > | u: | aa |
| u: | bb |||
| u: | cc |||
After the first
Hello,
I want to execute shell blocks like follows:
#+BEGIN_SRC shell :session n42 :dir /127.0.0.1: :shebang "#!/bin/bash"
echo los
echo $SHELL
echo $BASH
echo ready
#+end_src
The trouble is that the shebang property doesn't work in this case. The
script is executed with the login shell of the
25 matches
Mail list logo