Re: [O] Org mode at 34C3: my demo + request for help

2018-12-28 Thread stardiviner
I'd like to see a statistics of Org Mode and Emacs users too. How about use Org Mode to organize the project source code and publish as Org file? -- [ stardiviner ] I try to make every word tell the meaning what I want to express. Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/

[O] New "next" branch has issue on LaTeX block fontify

2018-12-28 Thread stardiviner
I'm using the "next" branch version Org Mode, but found the LaTeX block has fontify issue. You can see in the attachment screenshot: -- [ stardiviner ] I try to make every word tell the meaning what I want to express. Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/ IRC(freenode):

[O] Org mode at 34C3: my demo + request for help

2018-12-28 Thread Karl Voit
Hi! It's my first time at a CCC Congress[1]. There is an Emacs assembly: [2] by https://chaos.social/@Drops Since there was no Emacs talk at all and almost nothing going on on the Emacs assembly, I decided to do a basic Org mode demo to explain the universe of advantages to non-Emacs users: [3]

Re: [O] Release 9.2

2018-12-28 Thread Scott Randby
On 12/27/18 4:41 AM, Bastien wrote: > Hi all, > > Org 9.2 is out: https://orgmode.org > Greetings Org users, I installed Org 9.2 and I'm enjoying some of the new features. The new structure template mechanism is really nice because now I only have to remember C-c C-,. The ability to

[O] [PATCH 0/2] org-clock: Simplify `untilnow' range logic

2018-12-28 Thread Kyle Meyer
Hello, For the clock table `untilnow' behavior, we set the starting point to a really old date, but that falls outside the -MM-DD that org-parse-time-string was designed to handle. I've reworked org-clock-special-range to use nil to represent the starting bound for `untilnow' and updated

[O] [PATCH 1/2] org-clock: Simplify `untilnow' range logic

2018-12-28 Thread Kyle Meyer
* lisp/org-clock.el (org-clock-special-range): Use nil to represent `untilnow'. For `untilnow', org-clock-special-range sets the start to "<-50001-11-30 Tue 00:00>", but org-parse-time-string actually assumes a -MM-DD format and parses the year as 0001. By chance, this is still a really old

Re: [O] [PATCH] Suggestion to self-link headlines exported to HTML

2018-12-28 Thread Toon Claes
Thanks Nicolas for taking time to have look at my patch. I'm a attaching a second version of the patch. Please have another look. -- Toon From 094576d4c082fc384aa56bf2f4ec2749fec540a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Toon Claes Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 21:55:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ox-html: Make

[O] [PATCH 2/2] org-parse-time-string: Describe time stamp matching behavior

2018-12-28 Thread Kyle Meyer
* lisp/org-macs.el (org-parse-time-string): Document matching of -MM-DD substring. org-clock-special-range used to pass in <-50001-11-30 Tue 00:00> with the expectation that the year would be parsed as -50001, not 0001. Mention this -MM-DD format assumption in the docstring to help avoid

[O] combine two (or more) org tables to one

2018-12-28 Thread Uwe Brauer
Hi I have to generate a table with 18 columns. Even with org-table-toggle-column-width this is difficult to display. So I thought to divide the table into 2 or three, edit them separately and then combine them to the final one. I thought of using orgtbl-join but there seems a bug which I have

[O] default value for org-capture-templates

2018-12-28 Thread Tyler Smith
Hi, A question came up on StackOverflow asking about how to use the default capture template (`Task`) in combination with user-defined templates: https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/46794/where-is-default-org-mode-capture-template-for-tasks-located The default Task template is actually

Re: [O] Bug: C-u M-x org-footnote-action sort deletes footnotes used in #+include:’d files [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ /usr/share/emacs/25.3/lisp/org/)]

2018-12-28 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi Nicolas, Thank you for your answer! Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> When a file uses #+include: X.org to structure an org-file and the >> included files use footnotes defined in the master file, export works >> without problems, but sorting the footnotes by reference with >> : C-u M-x

Re: [O] Bug: C-u M-x org-footnote-action sort deletes footnotes used in #+include:’d files [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ /usr/share/emacs/25.3/lisp/org/)]

2018-12-28 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > When a file uses #+include: X.org to structure an org-file and the > included files use footnotes defined in the master file, export works > without problems, but sorting the footnotes by reference with > : C-u M-x org-footnote-action s > removes the