On 12/3/18 5:30 PM, Michael Hoffman wrote:
1. What exactly did you do?
- Execute:
(with-eval-after-load 'org
(add-hook 'org-shiftleft-final-hook 'windmove-left))
(org-agenda nil "a")
(split-window-horizontally)
- Type S-left
2. What did you expect to happen?
(windmove-left)
3. What
Understood, thank you!
пт, 3 мая 2019 г. в 17:03, Roland Everaert :
> For what I understand of eev (which I discover following this thread),
> the idea is to create "notebooks" (à la Jupyter) of commands that can be
> executed in
> any orders the user want. So, lenses could be useful to apply
For what I understand of eev (which I discover following this thread),
the idea is to create "notebooks" (à la Jupyter) of commands that can be
executed in
any orders the user want. So, lenses could be useful to apply the
correct mode the block of code at point.
Dmitrii Korobeinikov writes:
>>
On Thursday, 2 May 2019 at 21:11, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
> Well, at least there is a sane explanation. Ironically, I was also about to
> complain about all my loose ">"s getting flagged. So they are related!
> Would there be a way to make an exception for < and > inside of actual code
> forms?
Hi,
>> Using < and > as parenthesis in Org is questionable, I think.
>
> In Org syntax, < and > often come in pair (timestamps, some links,
> targets, radio targets). There is at least some interest in the current
> behaviour.
Yes, okay.
>> Also this behavior is not documented AFAICT.
>
> I
