I've convinced myself finally that this is a feature.
Daniele Nicolodi writes:
> Hello,
>
> I found an inconsistency between the manual and implementation: the
> Priorities section says that the range of valid priorities can be set
> modifying the `org-priority-highest', `org-priority-lowest' and
> `org-priority-default' variables. However, in the
ian martins writes:
> I've written some documentation for ob-java for worg. Should I submit a
> patch or is it fine to just push? it doesn't modify any existing files.
It's fine to just push.
ian martins writes:
> If I make the same change to dozens of tests in the same file, should I
> list them as separate bullets, or put the list of function names in
> parentheses, or is it better to omit the list if it would be long?
The second or third. I think it's a judgment call (and not
Hi Mauro,
Welcome! This is definitely not a crazy idea (or at least if it is
then you are in good company).
Org already has wide support as a markup language, and tools like
https://github.com/tecosaur/org-pandoc-import exist that leverage
this,
but the syntax is not standardized and as a
Hi everybody
This is my first message to the community, let me first state, I love
*org-mode.*Thanks to the authors and the contributors!
I use *org-mode* everyday, but I don't want to bore you with my stories
about how *org-mode* facilitates my life, just ask if you are interested.
I believe
Berry, Charles" via "General discussions about Org-mode. writes:
> FWIW, it doesn't seem like an accident. You might ping the author of this
> commit:
No, that change was to suppress an _additional_ confirmation that was
triggered by some internal implementation details.
Regards,
Achim.
--
Hello,
I found an inconsistency between the manual and implementation: the
Priorities section says that the range of valid priorities can be set
modifying the `org-priority-highest', `org-priority-lowest' and
`org-priority-default' variables. However, in the code the variables
names are
Just on a whim, I changed `org-babel-exp-results' by deleting
(let (org-confirm-babel-evaluate-NOT)
and the matching right parenthesis.
Now I get a single prompt to confirm evaluation using Ruiyang's ECM.
HTH,
Chuck
> On Oct 28, 2020, at 8:16 PM, Kyle Meyer wrote:
>
> 吴锐扬 writes:
>
>>
Hi James,
I would file this along with other ob-lang dependent features such
as TRAMP remote execution support. For example, python works as in
your other examples, but only if you define :var unordered="unordered"
as another variable before the variable you pass the plain list to
because
2020-10-23 Dante Catalfamo wrote:
That seems to work for the most part, but now I'm experiencing a strange
difference when evaluating. If I use a formula like
#+TBLFM:@2$3..@23$3=if($2!=0,12*$2,$3);%.2f::@24$2=vsum(@I..@II);%.2f::@24$3=vsum(@I..@II);%.2f
The column gets evaluated first,
Hmm, maybe.. Didn't consider that one.
But maybe my issue rather lies in how the visibility toggling with S-TAB
functions. The file property drawer is open in OVERVIEW and CONTENT but hidden
in SHOW ALL. My intuition says that the file-property drawer should be closed
for all toggle-states.
Hi all,
Since this is a bit of a long post, I've put my questions and summary
comment at the top, with the detailed context below.
1. What is the level of support for reading nested simple lists into
org-babel code blocks?
2. When the manual (see link below) says that they are not supported,
Kyle Meyer writes:
> Going through each of the collection functions at the end of
> org-agenda-get-day-entries, it looks like they all set org-marker.
> Plus, I can spot places in org-agenda.el that rely on agenda entries
> having org-marker (e.g., org-agenda-goto and org-agenda-todo), so I
>
ok I will do that.
If I make the same change to dozens of tests in the same file, should I
list them as separate bullets, or put the list of function names in
parentheses, or is it better to omit the list if it would be long?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 9:36 PM Kyle Meyer wrote:
> ian martins
I've written some documentation for ob-java for worg. Should I submit a
patch or is it fine to just push? it doesn't modify any existing files.
I've seen this question come up on this list before but I haven't seen an
answer. Also I couldn't find the answer on worg [1].
one note: I tweaked the
TEC writes:
> This seems very suspicious for one reason. I cannot see "Canvas"
> anywhere in the entire codebase of the website, or any loaded
> resources. So I have no idea where on earth the JS you're finding
> has come from - I'm guessing it's improperly injected by a
> extension. FWIW I also
Dear all,
I am resending this as I believe it's a useful concept to implement,
especially by those who track their tasks and do weekly/monthly reviews.
When I archive a repeated task (let's say, a learning project of 15 minutes
every Wednesday day for 2 months), the task gets archived in a date
18 matches
Mail list logo
