Done. Thanks.
All the best,
Tom
Wade McReynolds writes:
The babel-languages setup instructions for ABC list the outdated
"sh t" where they should have "shell t".
--
Thomas S. Dye
https://tsdye.online/tsdye
The babel-languages setup instructions for ABC list the outdated "sh t" where
they should have "shell t".
i should maybe point out that my focus in op is merely, literally
something like "possibilities for code for helping the user archive or
delete stuff in existing bloated org files".
but i am also ok with tangents like other ideas for speed and less
clutter and organizational tricks and so on.
the closest thing i have to types is merely this
- some files go in org-agenda-files, by basename pattern
- some to text search extra files, pattern, don't need the tses
- some to neither, no pattern [blog.org]
- some get put manually in refile targets
which has no real connection to either
TRS-80 writes:
> On 2021-03-04 16:11, Samuel Wales wrote:
> I have some other custom agenda functions as well, for things like
> periodic reviews (in the GTD sense) and others. Org's Agenda really
> is essentially just like a database query engine when you get right
> down to it (except
On 2021-03-04 16:11, Samuel Wales wrote:
tim> naming convention ... to determine what is included
this is also what i do. org-agenda-files is just set at startup
according to basename pattern.
I find it very interesting that all three of us seem to have
independently arrived at some of same
On 03/03/2021 23:11, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
Maxim Nikulin writes:
Please, do not forget to pass stings coming from user input through
shell-quote-argument.
So, maybe it would look better like this (`start-process' instead of
`start-process-shell-command')?:
My intention was just to warn
Hi,
Qqwy/Wiebe-Marten writes:
> However, the LaTeX that is exported will still create normal `enumerize`
> lists that do /not/ show up as alphabetical but rather still use `1.`,
> `2.`, `3.` for numbering.
>
> I think this current behaviour is at the very least surprising, and
> possibly
