Re: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Tim Cross
Brandon Taylor writes: > Okay. Well, I've gone ahead and installed LibreOffice, which took care of the > "missing 'soffice'" problem, but like a frustrating game of Whac-A-Mole, > another problem popped up. Now I'm left high and dry as to what might have > happened, because after adding the

Re: Bug: Duplicate logbook entry for repeated tasks [9.4.6 (9.4.6-gab9f2a @ /home/gustavo/.emacs.d/elpa/org-9.4.6/)]

2021-06-26 Thread Gustavo Barros
Hi All, On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 at 00:13, Jeff Kowalski wrote: While I don't have a fix for the root issue, I did have a chance to create a lint for LOGBOOK duplicates, as you suggested. Since Jeff put some effort, I went for some too. :-) I did some digging and, as far as I can tell, the

Re: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Brandon Taylor
Okay. Well, I've gone ahead and installed LibreOffice, which took care of the "missing 'soffice'" problem, but like a frustrating game of Whac-A-Mole, another problem popped up. Now I'm left high and dry as to what might have happened, because after adding the location of soffice.exe in my

Re: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread George Mauer
For anyone who has never tried it, I'll add that the open office formats are an absolute beast to export to. I can't say for sure about docx but I've done my time building a PowerPoint exporter (on top of Microsoft provided ooxml libraries even). It is complex enough that I'm not even sure such an

Re: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Tim Cross
Brandon Taylor writes: > I know we’re not supposed to really even TALK about proprietary software in > FOSS communities like this one, but I can’t help but wonder if someone > might consider making (an) Emacs plugin(s) that allow(s) a user to export Org > mode files to Microsoft Office file

Libre vs Open Office [was: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?]

2021-06-26 Thread tomas
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 09:49:02PM +0200, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > > On 2021-06-26, at 21:18, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 04:27:19PM +, Brandon Taylor wrote: > >> I’ve seen that LibreOffice can read and write to those formats, whereas > >> OpenOffice can only read

Re: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Marcin Borkowski
On 2021-06-26, at 21:18, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 04:27:19PM +, Brandon Taylor wrote: >> I’ve seen that LibreOffice can read and write to those formats, whereas >> OpenOffice can only read them. Or has OpenOffice overcome that particular >> barrier? > > I think

Re: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread tomas
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 04:27:19PM +, Brandon Taylor wrote: > I’ve seen that LibreOffice can read and write to those formats, whereas > OpenOffice can only read them. Or has OpenOffice overcome that particular > barrier? I think OpenOffice is practically dead. All interesting development

Boo Hiss ;-) [was: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?]

2021-06-26 Thread tomas
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 02:57:17PM +, Brandon Taylor wrote: > Okay. Well, I’m running Emacs on (boo, hiss) [...] Now we would boo and hiss much less if you could teach your software to not make such a blatant propaganda of itself: > Sent from

Re: do not attempt to clean the (no-longer-existent) ./contrib directory

2021-06-26 Thread Greg Minshall
Nicolas, > Oops, this one had almost fallen through the cracks! Applied. Thank you thank you! Greg

Re: do not attempt to clean the (no-longer-existent) ./contrib directory

2021-06-26 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Greg Minshall writes: > Nicolas, > >> Sure. Please go ahead. > > ahead and went. cheers, Greg Oops, this one had almost fallen through the cracks! Applied. Thank you > Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

RE: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Brandon Taylor
I’ve seen that LibreOffice can read and write to those formats, whereas OpenOffice can only read them. Or has OpenOffice overcome that particular barrier? Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Rob Sargent Sent:

Re: [PATCH] extra space at the end of lines in source

2021-06-26 Thread Greg Minshall
Sébastien Miquel, > > thanks. my trivial test shows this works*except* in the particular > > case where, when closing the Org Src buffer, `point` is on an empty > > line. in this case, that one empty line is given extra spaces. > Yes, I was aware of this, but didn't think we could do better in

Re: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Rob Sargent
Yes, that’s the place to start (and finish in a FOSSy way) > On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:29 AM, Brandon Taylor > wrote: > > Okay, I got that working, but now I’ve run into another error complaining > about a missing “soffice.” So that means I need to install either Apache > OpenOffice or

RE: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Brandon Taylor
Okay, I got that working, but now I’ve run into another error complaining about a missing “soffice.” So that means I need to install either Apache OpenOffice or LibreOffice, correct? Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Bruce

Re: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Juan Manuel Macías
Hello, Brandon Taylor writes: > I know we’re not supposed to really even TALK about proprietary > software in FOSS communities like this one, but I can’t help but > wonder if someone might consider making (an) Emacs plugin(s) that > allow(s) a user to export Org mode files to Microsoft Office

Re: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread John Kitchin
there is some code at https://github.com/jkitchin/scimax/blob/master/ox-word.el that does an ok job with pandoc. It isn't perfect though, and I don't think it ever will be. John --- Professor John Kitchin (he/him/his) Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical

Re: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
IDK myself, as I don't use Windows. But this looks helpful? https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/53957/how-to-fix-the-error-executable-zip-needed-for-creating-opendocument-files-w On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 10:57 AM Brandon Taylor wrote: > Okay. Well, I’m running Emacs on (boo, hiss)

RE: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Brandon Taylor
Okay. Well, I’m running Emacs on (boo, hiss) Windows, but I can’t seem to get my Org mode file to export to ODT. Emacs is complaining about a missing “zip” executable. How would I go about working around that little issue on a Windows system? Sent from

Re: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
Oops; it does. https://orgmode.org/manual/OpenDocument-Text-Export.html On Sat, Jun 26, 2021, 10:54 AM Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > MS Office supports OpenDocument, so that might be better path for org to > support. > > I've wondered myself why it doesn't already support it. > > On Sat, Jun 26,

Re: Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
MS Office supports OpenDocument, so that might be better path for org to support. I've wondered myself why it doesn't already support it. On Sat, Jun 26, 2021, 10:48 AM Brandon Taylor wrote: > I know we’re not supposed to really even TALK about proprietary software > in FOSS communities like

Export Org mode files to (gag, barf) MS Office?

2021-06-26 Thread Brandon Taylor
I know we’re not supposed to really even TALK about proprietary software in FOSS communities like this one, but I can’t help but wonder if someone might consider making (an) Emacs plugin(s) that allow(s) a user to export Org mode files to Microsoft Office file formats such as .docx, .xlsx and

Re: Large source block causes org-mode to be unusable

2021-06-26 Thread Léo Ackermann
Hi, As I found no convenient solution, I will try to write a small module that adress this problem. It will be a good occasion to discover Elisp :). It is thought as an alternative to org-special-latex-block: efficient fontification using default face, folding environment to hide proofs, pretty

Re: [wip-cite-new] Where is the development branch ?

2021-06-26 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Le samedi 26 juin 2021 à 10:35 +0200, Nicolas Goaziou a écrit : [ Snip... ] > > Where should I get this code ? > > For example, here: > > https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/src/wip-cite-new Thank you very much ! Is there a similar repository for the futire org-contrib package ? I

Re: Bug: Duplicate logbook entry for repeated tasks [9.4.6 (9.4.6-gab9f2a @ /home/gustavo/.emacs.d/elpa/org-9.4.6/)]

2021-06-26 Thread Gustavo Barros
Hi Jeff, On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 at 00:13, Jeff Kowalski wrote: While I don't have a fix for the root issue, I did have a chance to create a lint for LOGBOOK duplicates, as you suggested. It can be found here: Looks good! Thank you very much. Best regards, Gustavo.

Re: [PATCH] extra space at the end of lines in source

2021-06-26 Thread Sébastien Miquel
Greg Minshall writes: thanks. my trivial test shows this works*except* in the particular case where, when closing the Org Src buffer, `point` is on an empty line. in this case, that one empty line is given extra spaces. Yes, I was aware of this, but didn't think we could do better in this

Re: [wip-cite-new] Where is the development branch ?

2021-06-26 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Emmanuel Charpentier writes: > I wanted to test the (new|future) citation abilities of =Org= ; I > tested what is available in =citeproc-org= with the =org-ref} syntax > the latter supports. > > However, I also wanted to test what is available with the "new" syntax > planned for

Re: appearance of list as results from evaluating code blocks

2021-06-26 Thread Tim Cross
John Kitchin writes: > I think something is fishy in ob-clojure. > > When I look at how it runs, it is not obvious it is returning anything. > Instead it is wrapping the body like this > > "(clojure.pprint/pprint (do (list 1 2 (+ 1 2" > > which I assume is going to stdout maybe? > > With

[wip-cite-new] Where is the development branch ?

2021-06-26 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
I wanted to test the (new|future) citation abilities of =Org= ; I tested what is available in =citeproc-org= with the =org-ref} syntax the latter supports. However, I also wanted to test what is available with the "new" syntax planned for introduction in =Org=. According to