Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 8:55 AM John Kitchin
wrote:
> I think this kind of preview is well-suited for external packages.
You may be right.
> There is a subtle point I ran into with this preview approach though,
> and that is what is the backend export you want to see? People expect
> one
On 21/03/2022 18:51, John Kitchin wrote:
citenum and bibentry are the only two I am not sure have a CSL analog.
I read your messages once more and I should say that I feel some
disagreement of this one (I removed most of it) and the earlier and
longer one from Sun, 20 Mar 2022 20:31:29
On 24/03/2022 06:04, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
Nicolas, concerning a new thread, I have an impression that you are
busy with over activities since you are participating in discussions
not so frequently. So I am unsure at which moment it is appropriate to
raise such question
On 21/03/2022 18:51, John Kitchin wrote:
Vikas Rawal writes:
From the perspective of a user, this was only meant to express a
sentiment that one finds oneself in a situation of having to choose
between two good things, and that we have not been able to find a way
to make both compatible with
On 22/03/2022 00:00, John Kitchin wrote:
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
Indeed, the question of how to better support cross-references in org
is an important one.
I don't really use them much, and so am still unsure if this could be
addressed with incremental improvements in existing org link
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
I think this kind of preview is well-suited for external packages.
There is a subtle point I ran into with this preview approach though,
and that is what is the backend export you want to see? People expect
one source (org) to export to different backends, and even use one
source to make a PDF
Hello everyone!
Today, I tried to export my notes from Org to Texinfo (and then HTML)
and the result blew my mind. It produced a beautifully inter-linked
website, similar to the glorious Emacs manual. Org also exported the
citations in the correct format. I must say that I like the HTML output
Ihor Radchenko writes:
I patched a local checkout of the main branch, and I can confirm that
your works well here. I also added [1] to my configuration file to
upcase all the structure templates automatically. I hope we will have
this bundled with Org proper. Fantastic work!
[1] Code that
Please find attached a small patch for org-depend, which fixes a bug
(function 'remove-if' is unknown).
Thank you all for your work around emacs and org-mode!
best regards,
Damien Couroussé
--
Damien Couroussé
Research Engineer
Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives
11 matches
Mail list logo
