On 11 July 2022, Jack Kamm wrote:
2. When folded, I frequently found multiple headlines to be displayed on
the same line, like so:
* Headline 1...
* Headline 2...* Headline 3...
* Headline 4
Hitting Shift-Tab a few times (org-global-cycle) usually fixed the
problem.
That's very much like a
On 3 June 2022, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
William Denton writes:
For me, this looks like either a mixed installation (please post the
output of M-x org-version) or some third-party package misbehaving.
M-x org-version says:
Org mode version 9.5.3 (release_9.5.3-511-g8e69ad @
Due to various reasons I'm now using Cygwin/X Emacs, and for this emacs,
(gui-get-selection) method is kind of slow (about 0.2) seconds.
While this is not a big deal usually, (org-get-x-clipboard) calls
(gui-get-selection) 4 times with different formats (utf8, text,
compound-text and string).
On
Gustavo Barros writes:
> But not to bump empty handed, I did some investigation on this, and I
> think I know why the problem happens.
Thanks for the detailed analysis!
> What I'm not sure is why this condition is there in the first place.
> That's the only place where the let-bound `todayp'
David Boss writes:
> You tell me to "surround" slashes by zero-width-space characters, to keep
> them from being taken as italic escapes.OK. First problem: what, exactly, is
> the zero-width space character? I won't be entering text with my fingers, a
> lispfunction I wrote will be inserting
I'm currently maintaining org-contacts (well, inactively)
Here is my own org-contacts' org-capture template, maybe you want to check out
as reference:
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(add-to-list 'org-capture-templates
`("C" ,(format "%s\tContacts"
Jack Kamm writes:
> I started noticing a couple issues with folding, after updating my
> org-mode in recent months:
May you provide the output of M-x org-version?
> 1. Inserting text below or above a folded headline will cause it to
> unfold. I am not sure if this is an intentional change, but
ypuntot writes:
> I'm going to start using org-contacts. And, with that, I would like to use
> org-capture or yankpad. Which one would you recommend using?
> I have been trying to use org-capture but it doesn't seem too intuitive for
> me :$
>
> I saved time ago a tutorial for yankpad, and
Dear All,
the attached patch adds support for filter-based sub-bibliographies in the "csl"
org-cite export processor. It supports the same syntax for specifying
filters as the biblatex processor and supports some of the biblatex
filter types, concretely, entry-type and keyword based filtering. It
Hi, Timothy,
Timothy writes:
> Yep, so in my config’s implementation I have an alist of fontset names and
> individual fonts. For something part of org-mode itself, we’d probably want to
> add a format level to this, something like:
>
> ┌
> │ ((fontset-name .
> │ ((serif .
> │
Many thanks for your warm welcome, kind review and suggestions.
I do not provide a corrective patch in this email, but it'll come soon
depending on possible other remarks or follow-ups of this email.
On 07/07/2022 12:41, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Valentin Lab writes:
Note that we rarely change
I'm going to start using org-contacts. And, with that, I would like to use
org-capture or yankpad. Which one would you recommend using? I have been trying
to use org-capture but it doesn't seem too intuitive for me :$
I saved time ago a tutorial for yankpad, and it looked nice.
Does org-capture
Hi Juan,
> When you talk about fontset, I understand that you mean lists of
> families with their options that you have previously defined, is that
> right?
Yep, so in my config’s implementation I have an alist of fontset names and
individual fonts. For something part of org-mode itself, we’d
On 11/07/2022 21:23, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
\ifpdftex, \ifPDFTeX
True if PDFTEX is in use (whether writing PDF or DVI), so this is true
for documents processed with both the latex and pdflatex commands.
So the code says: if pdfTeX is used, do nothing; else, add this
On 10/07/2022 03:22, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
LuaTeX and XeTeX are
digital typesetting systems. They are not word processors.
I have skimmed through the discussion happened exactly a year ago
https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/scuirf$m7o$1...@ciao.gmane.io/
and I should repeat that you are too
On 11/07/2022 09:36, David Boss wrote:
I generally run in Fundamental mode. Since ASCII is really only a 7-bit
code, I use the high bit to indicate italics.
...
I want to be able to copy an emacs buffer, with some characters having
italic mode set, and paste that into an email compose buffer,
I started noticing a couple issues with folding, after updating my
org-mode in recent months:
1. Inserting text below or above a folded headline will cause it to
unfold. I am not sure if this is an intentional change, but I find the
new behavior confusing -- usually I am trying to enter a new
Timothy writes:
> As an illustrative example, if I include this in one of my documents and
> create
> a PDF:
> ┌
> │ #+options: fontset:biolinum
> └
>
> Then I’ll get text with:
> ⁃ libertine roman as the serif font
> ⁃ biolinum as the serif, and default, font
> ⁃ source code pro as the
Max Nikulin writes:
>> \\relax
>> \\else
>
> Is it the case of latex as the old engine with tex->dvi->ps workflow
> besides new XeTeX and LuaTeX? However such engine is not used by Org.
According to the iftex documentation (p. 2):
\ifpdftex, \ifPDFTeX
True if PDFTEX is in use (whether
Hi All,
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 21:40, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Gustavo Barros writes:
The glitch is that some repeated tasks, when marked done in the
Agenda,
show no visual feedback that the action has taken place, as usual,
and
if you refresh the Agenda, they just vanish, which
Hi Ihor & co.,
> As I recall, Timothy has been working on simplifying preamble
> generation. If we do not put unnecessary packages into preamble,
> compilation will be significantly faster.
>
> If Timothy can come up with a patch some time soon, I’d prefer to have a
> more targeted preamble.
Tim Cross writes:
> Juan, if I understand your proposal correctly, I think your on the right
> track. It sounds like what you are proposing would have almost no impact
> on basic users like me, but would allow those with more demanding
> requirements to adjust without too much effort. I
On 11/07/2022 03:23, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
3. A variable (something like 'org-latex-fontspec-default-configuration') would
return something like this:
(format
\\usepackage{iftex}
\\ifpdftex
I like the idea of unified preamble suitable for pdflatex and lualatex.
For pdftex
Juan Manuel Macías writes:
> By the way, although I've already commented on it in some post in the
> parent thread, i think this package I wrote might be useful for doing a
> quick visual test of a font (including opentype features test), using
> org-latex-preview (compiling with LuaTeX). It can
Stefan Nobis writes:
> Juan Manuel Macías writes:
>
>> 1. There could be a defcustom, something like 'org-latex-use-fontspec'
>> (I would vote for nil by default).
>
> I would vote to activate this by default.
I voted nil because of the available fonts issue. But I think what you
say below is a
"Christopher M. Miles" writes:
> When setting this option:
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> (setq org-list-demote-modify-bullet '(("+" . "-") ("-" . "+") ("*" . "+")))
> #+end_src
>
> I right shift list checkbox with [Alt-Right] caused error:
> ...
> Become:
>
> - [ ] list item 1
> [ ] ] list item
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> I (quickly) searched the list but did not find that the issue was
> raised before, so here I go.
>
> I had saved for myself an excerpt from the list archive. I wanted to
> consult again the whole thread, so I type into Google:
>
>"primarily latex/natbib
David Boss writes:
> Org mode is very crude: it indicates italics by surrounding text by slashes,
> and so,
> what if the original text contained slashes, intended as ordinary
> text, not escape characters? What if the slashes themselves are
> intended to be italicized?
You can then surround
Hi Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Bastien, could you please add Matt to tiny change contributor list?
Done in https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg/commit/f7825a7c, also sorting the
list of names.
--
Bastien
I generally run in Fundamental mode. Since ASCII is really only a 7-bit code, I
use the high bit to indicate italics. I wrote a Java program for printing; it
makes all characters 16-bit, despite their starting as 8-bit,so no problem. For
emacs, I wrote the necessary hooks to catch high bits in
Hello.
I (quickly) searched the list but did not find that the issue was
raised before, so here I go.
I had saved for myself an excerpt from the list archive. I wanted to
consult again the whole thread, so I type into Google:
"primarily latex/natbib users like john"
and I get:
Your
Juan Manuel Macías writes:
> 1. There could be a defcustom, something like 'org-latex-use-fontspec'
> (I would vote for nil by default).
I would vote to activate this by default.
> (format
> \\usepackage{iftex}
> \\ifpdftex
> \\relax
> \\else
> \\usepackage{fontspec}
>
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> But can someone check if Free* fonts are available on Windows and
> Mac by default?
I just checked TeXLive (on MacOS, but should be the same on all
systems): The Free* fonts are part of TeXLive as truetype and as
opentype versions (and partly in other formats).
For
When setting this option:
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(setq org-list-demote-modify-bullet '(("+" . "-") ("-" . "+") ("*" . "+")))
#+end_src
I right shift list checkbox with [Alt-Right] caused error:
#+begin_src org
,* test
- [ ] list item 1
- [ ] list item 2
Become:
- [ ] list item 1
[ ] ]
34 matches
Mail list logo
