Re: Intention of verbatim text?

2023-01-03 Thread c.buhtz
Thanks for all your feedback. On 2023-01-04 05:58 Tim Cross wrote: > argue that =text= should be rendered as text I did this before but then got them as paragraphs. Not sure how the correct term of this is in HTML. pre is not inline but handled as an own paragraph so that you have an extra line

Re: Re: LaTeX tutorial (focused on what Org exports) ??

2023-01-03 Thread Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
David Masterson writes: > "Fraga, Eric" writes: >> On Sunday, 1 Jan 2023 at 13:43, Ihor Radchenko wrote: >>> I think that it is not very clear how to use it. >>> Abstract says that it is self-explaining, but it appears that not every >>> pdf viewer supports showing the explanations. >> >> Yes, th

Re: Feature request: "task table" (similar to clock table)

2023-01-03 Thread Marcin Borkowski
On 2023-01-03, at 19:29, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> I see. I think I'll go another route then - in fact, I already started, >> see https://mbork.pl/2023-01-02_Computing_Org_mode_TODO_stats :-) > > That will also work. > > But why `plist-get' + `org-element-at-point-

Re: LaTeX tutorial (focused on what Org exports) ??

2023-01-03 Thread David Masterson
"Fraga, Eric" writes: > On Monday, 2 Jan 2023 at 19:23, David Masterson wrote: >> Um, when I viewed it in my Emacs pdfviewer, it appeared to look fine >> *EXCEPT* that it appeared to be in Latin (good Latin, I think, but I >> don't read Latin). > > it's not the text of the document that matters;

Re: Babel (scheme): Evaluation errors are not shown

2023-01-03 Thread Bastien
Hi Rudolf, Rudolf Adamkovič writes: > So, my use of Scheme drops from 8 hours per day to effectively 0, > effective today. As a result, I would like to kindly ask you to revert > the change, for without actively using something, I cannot maintain it. Sure, done. > That said, if my employer ch

Re: Babel (scheme): Evaluation errors are not shown

2023-01-03 Thread Rudolf Adamkovič
Bastien Guerry writes: > I just added you as the maintainer of ob-scheme.el. A sudden turn of events: My employer have just decided that we will convert all Scheme to Fennel, a zero-runtime Lisp based on Lua, because it has a better bus factor, meaning that, in the worst-case, the company can c

Re: Intention of verbatim text?

2023-01-03 Thread Tim Cross
writes: > Hi, > > in org you can have inline verbatim and code text elements like this. > > Example with =verbatim= and ~code~. > > I would like to understand what "verbatim" really means. What is the > semantic behind it? What content should go in there? > > > I'm aware of the separation o

Re: Feature request: "task table" (similar to clock table)

2023-01-03 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Marcin Borkowski writes: > I see. I think I'll go another route then - in fact, I already started, > see https://mbork.pl/2023-01-02_Computing_Org_mode_TODO_stats :-) That will also work. But why `plist-get' + `org-element-at-point-no-context'? You can instead use `org-element-property' + `or

Re: Feature request: "task table" (similar to clock table)

2023-01-03 Thread Marcin Borkowski
On 2022-12-27, at 08:48, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >>> If you have interest, going through org-colview.el code would be >>> helpful. It is a bit messy and deserves more cleaning and commenting. >> >> Since org-colview is pretty long, I decided to look into the manual >

Re: Intention of verbatim text?

2023-01-03 Thread Daniel Fleischer
c.bu...@posteo.jp [2023-01-03 Tue 13:20] wrote: > in org you can have inline verbatim and code text elements like this. > > Example with =verbatim= and ~code~. > > The org html export to create both with tag. So in HTML output > there is no difference between verbatim and code anymore. > > I

on inlinetask's 1st line inserts a star

2023-01-03 Thread Alain . Cochard
release_9.6-193-g30314c A right after 'M-x org-inlinetask-insert-task' adds a star to the 15 already there; another , another star, and so on. Same thing with cursor after a TODO keyword. The behavior is the same if there is some content inside the inlinetask (i.e., not on the 1st line). --

Intention of verbatim text?

2023-01-03 Thread c.buhtz
Hi, in org you can have inline verbatim and code text elements like this. Example with =verbatim= and ~code~. I would like to understand what "verbatim" really means. What is the semantic behind it? What content should go in there? I'm aware of the separation of content and its presentatio

Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?)

2023-01-03 Thread Matt
On Tue, 03 Jan 2023 05:50:17 -0500 Ihor Radchenko wrote --- > I was mostly worried about session states affecting subsequent test > invocations. But I do agree that it may be better to keep them. That makes sense. I tend to run tests one at a time unless I'm about to submit patches

Re: Screenshots in ORG-NEWS

2023-01-03 Thread Bastien
Ihor Radchenko writes: > I am afraid that maintaining both etc/ORG-NEWS and also worg/news.org > will be a bit too much. Maintaining etc/ORG-NEWS is the responsability of maintainers. Adding useful (possibly visual) informations on Worg is the task of the community. Of course, the work people

Re: Export Org with Org concept -- Re: Problems with C-c C-e file.org,

2023-01-03 Thread Eduardo Ochs
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023, 09:23 Max Nikulin, wrote: > On 03/01/2023 17:01, Eduardo Ochs wrote: > > > > Can you send to me - here to the mailing list - a version of > > `org-export-dispatch', and also of other functions if needed, in which > > the parts that call `read-char-exclusive' are replaced by so

Re: Export Org with Org concept -- Re: Problems with C-c C-e file.org,

2023-01-03 Thread Max Nikulin
On 03/01/2023 17:01, Eduardo Ochs wrote: Can you send to me - here to the mailing list - a version of `org-export-dispatch', and also of other functions if needed, in which the parts that call `read-char-exclusive' are replaced by something non-blocking? Eduardo, I am sorry, but from my opinio

Re: [BUG] worg-setup.org is outdated

2023-01-03 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Tim Cross writes: > I would still like to get back to this, but right now, don't know where > things are likely to be in the short term. There are some job related > things which will be eitehr completed or stepped up to the next stage by > mid Feb and I may have a clearer picture by then. For no

Re: [SECURITY] Arbitrary code evaluation security in Org (was: [PATCH] ob-core: add org-confirm-babel-evaluate-cell custom variable)

2023-01-03 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Tim Cross writes: >> 1. Introduce a new customization `org-confirm-evaluate-safe-regexps' >>listing regexps that are considered safe or cons cells >>(src-body/header-arg/table/macro/diary . regexp) >> >> 2. Introduce a new customization `org-confirm-evaluate' that can be set >>to t/ni

Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?)

2023-01-03 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Matt writes: > On Mon, 02 Jan 2023 04:47:10 -0500 Ihor Radchenko wrote --- > > They will not be reliable when tests are executed interactively. > > If the `should' condition fails, `kill-buffer' will never be executed > > leaving dirty state, especially for sessions. > > From my persp

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

2023-01-03 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Bastien writes: > To be sure that we are not miscommunicating, my point is that we can > advertize https://orgmode.org/worg/org-orphanage.html as a place where > anyone can document orphan Org packages, then once there are enough > packages on this page, we can try solving the other problem, that

Re: Screenshots in ORG-NEWS

2023-01-03 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Bastien writes: > Still, etc/ORG-NEWS should stick to being text only. > > What about a new worg/news.org file with a timeline with new stuff, > along with pictures? I am afraid that maintaining both etc/ORG-NEWS and also worg/news.org will be a bit too much. Though maybe one can be a source for

Re: Export Org with Org concept -- Re: Problems with C-c C-e file.org,

2023-01-03 Thread Eduardo Ochs
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 06:47, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > > Eduardo Ochs writes: > > > (3) _is_ my experience with the Org mailing list. > > > > What I meant by "the developers like your questions" was roughly: > > "recognizing that that person deserves help, and giving him tools that > > would let hi

[SECURITY] Tangling can overwrite arbitrary tangling targets, including important user files (was: [SECURITY] Arbitrary code evaluation security in Org)

2023-01-03 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Greg Minshall writes: > one additional item (i don't *think* we discussed this before; apologies > if i'm forgetting): tangling. if one is prompted to "merely" tangle ... > > #+begin_src sh :tangle /var/tmp/foo.org.tangled > echo 'hi!' > #+end_src > > > one could imagine more siniste

Re: Export Org with Org concept -- Re: Problems with C-c C-e file.org,

2023-01-03 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Eduardo Ochs writes: > (3) _is_ my experience with the Org mailing list. > > What I meant by "the developers like your questions" was roughly: > "recognizing that that person deserves help, and giving him tools that > would let him solve his problems in hours instead of in months or > years". > >

Re: Refactor org-babel-shell-initialize? (was Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?))

2023-01-03 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Matt writes: > On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 07:56:10 -0500 Ihor Radchenko wrote --- > > As for being a macro, there will be not much gain - the convention is > > mostly designed for things like `cl-defun' aimed to be used in the code. > > `org-babel-shell-initialize' is only used by `org-babe

Re: LaTeX tutorial (focused on what Org exports) ??

2023-01-03 Thread Fraga, Eric
On Monday, 2 Jan 2023 at 19:23, David Masterson wrote: > Um, when I viewed it in my Emacs pdfviewer, it appeared to look fine > *EXCEPT* that it appeared to be in Latin (good Latin, I think, but I > don't read Latin). it's not the text of the document that matters; it's the popups that describe h

Re: Babel (scheme): Evaluation errors are not shown

2023-01-03 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen writes: >> Thanks! >> Note that your patch does not apply onto main. > > Rebased against the latest main. Please see the appended patch. Hmm. Not sure what is going on here, but I am getting 128 git … am --3way -- /tmp/0001-lisp-ob-scheme.el-Do-not-hide-Scheme-evaluatio