On Sunday, January 7th, 2024 at 14:06, Jack Kamm wrote:
> It looks like ob-R and ob-julia are the only languages that start
> sessions on edit (based on grepping for "edit-prep" and
> "associate-session").
>
> I think their behavior is peculiar enough to have an ob-R/julia-specific
> option on
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> So, a good option could be
> (1) removing (org-babel-comint-buffer-livep session) from
> `org-src-associate-babel-session'
> (2) Removing `org-babel-edit-prep:R'
>
> With the above, we can use `org-babel-python-associate-session'
Sounds good to me.
> I imagine that
On 04.01.2024 15:43, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
gerard.vermeu...@posteo.net writes:
Attached you'll find a new version of the patch that addresses your
comments. I have modified the ERT test so that it checks most of
your examples showing where the older versions of the patch failed.
The test is
> The reported bug is a side effect of a feature when Org automatically
> reveals hidden outlines that are "broken" due to edits and thus could
> not be unfolded easily. For example, when destroying parent heading in a
> folding subtree:
I'd be in favor of changing `kill-whole-line` to do the
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Yes, it is a real bug.
> It has been reported previously in
> https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/db9pr06mb7753e0e548b2fb6614285847c6...@db9pr06mb7753.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com/
Fixed, on main.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=97951352b
--
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> However, that only works if [[* is the last thing in the line. If there
>> is something after point in that line, it fails with the following message:
>>
>> cl--assertion-failed: Assertion failed: (<= start (point)), #> 243 in foo.org>, 242
>
> Confirmed.
Fixed, on
Timothy writes:
>> This is a fork of the ODT exporter in Emacs Orgmode.
>
> Should I take this to mean that the ox-odt.el in org-mode is no longer
> actively
> maintained?
ox-odt.el in Org mode does not currently have a dedicated maintainer.
So, it is maintained just as any other library
Jack Kamm writes:
>> Now, the question is what to do with the existing implementation of
>> `org-src-associate-babel-session'. It only runs
>> org-babel--associate-session when
>>
>> (and session (not (string= session "none"))
>> (org-babel-comint-buffer-livep session)
>> (let ((f
