Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi Cian,
Its just that when drafting papers I tend to have lots and lots of
indentation in early drafts, and while narrowing trees is a godsend, the
unnecessary (for my purposes) indentation is slightly annoying.
If the purpose of such a
bastiengue...@googlemail.com writes:
Cian OConnor cian.ocon...@gmail.com writes:
Now if I go to level 3 and create a sparse tree I get this:
* level 3
* level 4
Which is fine and usable, but it would be nice to have the option to
have the following instead:
* level 3
* level 4
I really like refiling functionality in org-mode and use it quite a
bit. However one thing that annoys me is that quite often I simply want
to refile in the same buffer. Is there a way to do this that I've
missed? Or do I simply have to select the name of the current buffer as
I currently do.
What I'd like to be able to do is the following. Say I have the
following tree:
* level 1
* level 2
* level 3
* level 4
Now if I go to level 3 and create a sparse tree I get this:
* level 3
* level 4
Which is fine and usable, but it would be nice to have the option to
have
Gabi Danon gabida...@gmail.com writes:
Org-mode is the killer app for emacs, surely? It is the reason I'm using
Emacs again after a five year gap - and not just org-mode, but BBDB and
GNUS as well.
One of the things that I find astonishing is that it does so many
disparate things so well. For
Add the following to your .emacs file:
(setq split-width-threshold 999)
I actually like the change, but then I'm using a widescreen monitor
where it makes more sense.
Paul Mead wrote:
Benjamin Andresen be...@in-ulm.de writes:
Hey Paul,
I don't know if this will exactly revert it back
Hi,
I'm using a fairly recent build of Emacs 23 on windows (23.0.94.1), and
while follow-mode seems to work fine for ordinary files, it does not
work in .org files. Instead I get a blank screen for the second buffer.
I'm using the latest version of org-mode (from the website, not CVS).
How embarrassing. I was getting mixed up with indirect buffers. So while
the bug report is technically valid, it seems fairly unimportant...
Did I mention what a great product this is..?
Cian OConnor wrote:
Hi,
I'm using a fairly recent build of Emacs 23 on windows (23.0.94.1),
and while
