Thanks, Bastien! Just found the Preferred way of submitting patches
document.
Quoth Bastien on Prickle-Prickle, the 24th of Chaos:
Hi Peter,
Peter Danenberg p...@roxygen.org writes:
It's been irritating me that after saving an edit buffer, the undo
history disappears; the attached patch
It's been irritating me that after saving an edit buffer, the undo
history disappears; the attached patch restores the undo history.
diff --git a/lisp/org-src.el b/lisp/org-src.el
index 8cdf81e..e85e04e 100644
--- a/lisp/org-src.el
+++ b/lisp/org-src.el
@@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ the language, a switch
No, just requiring should do the trick. Can you check if
org-export-bibtex-preprocess does indeed end up in the hook?
It does now, inexplicably; thank you. And using the following code, I
can process the doc with xelatex and bibtex (provided that file.bib
accompanies file.org):
(require
Despite org-mode/contrib/lisp being in my loadpath and issuing
(require 'org-exp-bibtex), org-exp-bibtex doesn't seem to be
available. Using autoload results in Autoloading failed to define
function org-exp-bibtex.
Would anyone mind sharing with me how they successfully installed
org-exp-bibtex?
There is no function org-exp-bibtex.
What happens if you evalueate the following form?
(progn (require 'org-exp-bibtex) (featurep 'org-exp-bibtex))
That evaluates to t.
Are there hooks installed, by the way, for exported to LaTeX? C-c C-e
d (export as LaTeX, process to PDF, and open the
Are you sure about it being in your load-path? What does
M-x locate-library RET org-exp-bibtex RET
say? If it finds it, both autoload and require should work.
locate-library says:
Library is file ~/lib/emacs/org-mode/contrib/lisp/org-exp-bibtex.el
Just to be sure, my require form looks
I'd like to be able to do something like the following:
- item 1
- item 1.1
#+BEGIN_SRC lang
code
#+END_SRC
- item 1.2
...
but the source blocks are interpreted as text despite section 2.7 of
the manual, which says:
Since indentation is what governs the
version. What does
M-x org-version
say?
- Carsten
On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:07 AM, Peter Danenberg wrote:
I'd like to be able to do something like the following:
- item 1
- item 1.1
#+BEGIN_SRC lang
code
#+END_SRC
- item 1.2
...
but the source blocks
