Adam Spiers wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I
think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and
.
Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subsequently
told my presence at the event is no longer necessary.
William Henney wrote:
Agreed. I do fall behind on reading it every now and then but I always
try and catch up because the quality of discussions is so high. I like
having such a receptive community.
Agreed too. Sometimes my eyes glaze over the GTD threads, but I can
always mute the threads
Adam Spiers wrote:
This seems like a good idea. Another related one occurred to me today
(if it's necessary) which is toggling between the two list indicators.
e.g.
- foo
- bar
- baz |-- Point
Calling the toggle-list-indicator function at the point will cause the
list indicator to change
Hi all,
I keep getting the following error after performing a M-x remember,
entering some text in the new buffer and pressing C-c C-c. The
following error occurs on the final C-c C-c.
(error Invalid search bound (wrong side of point))
As far as I know I have the configuration setup as
Every now and then I find myself mispressing SHIFT-up/SHIFT-down on an
outline and assigning a priority to it. This then often leads me to
navigating the point to the priority to delete it manually.
It would be great if SHIFT-up/SHIFT-down would cycle through:
[#A]
[#B]
[#C]
_ - blank (i.e.
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On my website I have put version 5.04 of org-mode, it contains
the latest bug fixes, but hardly any new features. As an exception
I am *not* uploading this version to CVS Emacs, to avoid the risk
that there will be a deadly bug that I cannot fix for 3 weeks.
Hi
Hi all,
I've recently started investigating blorg (sorry David) with the hope of
using it (and org-mode) to start a blog. Unfortunately I've run into a
few issues, and would appreciate some help.
--
Firstly it appears that my paragraphs don't render as such from memory I
have something
Eddward DeVilla wrote:
On 7/11/07, Rick Moynihan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this something people might find useful? I personally find I spend a
lot of time trying to re-acquire my previous context within a particular
task, something like this might help.
Actually, after thinking about
Eddward DeVilla wrote:
On 7/6/07, Rick Moynihan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After thinking about it; I have on occasion wanted to schedule a
checkboxed item into the agenda. This said I'm not convinced supporting
this is a good idea. Does anyone else have any views?
I'm usually for collapsing
-buffer (find-buffer-visiting local-ical-file))
--- code snip ---
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
--
Rick Moynihan
Software Engineer
Calico Jack LTD
http
When at home I get the following error in org-mode when bringing up the Agenda:
Wrong type argument: stringp, nil
I don't get this error on my setup at work.
I am using org 4.77 (reports as 4.76) with GNU Emacs 22.1.50.1
(i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.10.11) of 2007-06-09. This version
of
) be better if the first push of tab aligned with '-
item 1', with subsequent tabs indenting to the next level. You should
however be restricted to only going one level deeper than the above item.
This said I usually create list items at the same level of indentation
with M-Return.
--
Rick
it into a page of my site. it could be a collaboratively
written Org-Mode Strategy and Tactics
If anyone enjoys this, I'll get started by writing my own entry.
--
Rick Moynihan
Software Engineer
Calico Jack LTD
http://www.calicojack.co.uk
The following doesn't render quite right:
*** TODO Weekly Backup
SCHEDULED: 2007-06-01 Fri +1w
The date loses it's underline and takes on the colouring of 'SCHEDULED:'
. Where as the trailing '' is underlined and coloured like a normal
timestamp.
--
Rick Moynihan
Software Engineer
normally. For now anyway... :)
R.
Carsten Dominik wrote:
I cannot reproduce that bug. Anyone?
- Carsten
On Apr 9, 2007, at 12:13, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Hi, I've been playing with org-mode 4.70 and I'm really liking the
multiple TODO sequences.
However, I seem to have encountered a bug with org
Wow! Barely a week from submitting the idea, and it's implemented in
org-mode! This is great!
A minor issue I have with the implementation is that it if you have enabled:
#+STARTUP: lognotestate
org-mode will prompt you for a note when transitioning between different
sequences in addition
Carsten Dominik wrote:
No, this does not work. Could be done, of course, but adds complexity,
and I am sure once it is there, people will want to switch
TODO keywords constantly, filling the entire file with new #+TODO
statements. Does not feel right.
How about the following alternative:
Bastien wrote:
Rick Moynihan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can see that my suggestion would add complexity in both code and org
files. Supporting multiple DONE states would be a nice, especially if
they integrate properly with the agenda.
Maybe we could use the same grouping conventions than
Hi,
I've been using org-mode happily for nearly 6 months and think it's a
fantastic tool!! I've always quite liked Emacs, but org-mode has led to
me really seeing Emacs's potential.
I was however wondering if there was anyway for org-mode to support
multiple TODO sequences within a single
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
