Re: Org mode export accessibility

2022-10-01 Thread T.V Raman
Ihor Radchenko writes: No on both counts. > "T.V Raman" writes: > >> 8. Now, connect the dots, newer LaTeX packages like the one mentioned >>(there may well be others now or in the future) can inprinciple >>ensure that the required "back pointers

Re: Org mode export accessibility

2022-09-30 Thread T.V Raman
correct; user-facing tools are still lacking but that shouldn't cause us to wait since that creates a chicken-and-egg problem. Max Nikulin writes: > On 30/09/2022 20:29, T.V Raman wrote: > > > > 9. Note that this is not the end of the trail; for such exports to > >

Re: Org mode export accessibility

2022-09-30 Thread T.V Raman
writes: > Accessibility issues of exported files have been raised on the Org mode > mail list again. I decided to revive this thread because I noticed a > LaTeX package that may be related to the following suggestion (I am not > sure that I got it right though). > > On 0

Re: Org mode export accessibility

2022-07-09 Thread T.V Raman
as a format doesn't have the affordance to preserve the LaTeX and even if you kluged up something --- the tools to extract that out of the PDF would need to be invented. > "T.V Raman" writes: > >> > > 3. For math especially, make sure the TeX/LaTeX is preser

Re: Org mode export accessibility

2022-07-08 Thread T.V Raman
1. Labels: yes -- figure captions etc. are examples of "labels" in general. 2. Math: Yes -- I meant the TeX/LaTeX representation of a math expression. Ihor Radchenko writes: > "T.V Raman" writes: > > > On org side: > > Thanks for the

Re: Org mode export accessibility

2022-07-08 Thread T.V Raman
Correct. 1. Org should be the truth, not some export format that is picked based on political opinion. 2. Lowest Common denominator in my vocabulary is a "bad word" that LCD is something that makes everyone equally unhappy. So Take-Away: 1. Make org the best format for holding the

Re: Org mode export accessibility

2022-07-07 Thread T.V Raman
gt; https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/Output-Formats.html > <=> Info,Text,HTML,DVI,PostScript{PS},PDF,DocBook,XML > > ** Related/useful may be: "latex2nemeth"--a LATEX to Braille/Nemeth, > approach "Simple pictures in PSTricks ar

Re: Org mode export accessibility

2022-07-07 Thread T.V Raman
P.S. Emacspeak is not camel-cased -- please say Emacspeak -- and not with the 's' capitalized. -- Thanks, --Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research) ♉ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 瑩 -- Thanks, --Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research) ♉ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 瑩

Re: Org mode export accessibility

2022-07-07 Thread T.V Raman
currently supported by Texinfo: > https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/Output-Formats.html > <=> Info,Text,HTML,DVI,PostScript{PS},PDF,DocBook,XML > > ** Related/useful may be: "latex2nemeth"--a LATEX to Braille/Nemeth, > approach "Simple pictu

Re: Org mode export accessibility

2022-06-27 Thread T.V Raman
Thanks for looping me in. I'm not subscribed to emacs-orgmode --- so feel free to forward if you find the thoughts below materially useful. As a long-term org-mode user --- and an even longer term TeX user: here are some thoughts: 1. Accessibility as word used in isolation has now become