Re: [O] Relative Remote Reference (column-row)

2014-03-23 Thread Volker Strobel
Thanks, Michael, for this helpful workaround! On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Volker On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Volker Strobel volker.strobe...@gmail.com wrote: My problem is, that this remote reference starts in row 3 (because

Re: [O] Namespace problem org-mode / Clojure

2014-03-20 Thread Volker Strobel
A belated, but very big thanks to both of you! It works perfectly now :) Best, Volker On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote: Hi, Soapy Smith soapy-sm...@comcast.net writes: I installed the update and ran Volker's test code. It works! The namespace is preserved

[O] Relative Remote Reference (column-row)

2014-03-20 Thread Volker Strobel
Hi there, I'm trying to refer to the row number of a remote table, using the current column number shifted by one. Remote Table: #+NAME: my-table | Header1 | Header2 | |-+-| | a |23 | | b |7| | c |13 | | d |66 | | e |5|

Re: [O] Namespace problem org-mode / Clojure

2014-02-25 Thread Volker Strobel
Hi Soapy, thank you! I feel at ease knowing that you could replicate the behavior, as I was trying to find the error in my settings for a long, long time (and as mentioned before, it did work for some time, and I've no clue why - I've played around with some settings in the init file). And

[O] Namespace problem org-mode / Clojure

2014-02-21 Thread Volker Strobel
Hi, I'm trying to use org-mode with Clojure and already posted my problem at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/clojure/lnZWUH4XxJM All my code blocks get evaluated in the namespace user, even if I evaluate the (ns ...) code block first. EXAMPLE (core.org in src/org-works of Leiningen

Re: [O] Namespace problem org-mode / Clojure

2014-02-21 Thread Volker Strobel
should be able to do something like: #+header: :package org-works.core to execute code in that name space. hth, Tom Volker Strobel volker.strobe...@gmail.com writes: Hi, I'm trying to use org-mode with Clojure and already posted my problem at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic