Hi All,
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 17:22, Gustavo Barros wrote:
> This is a small feature request for `org-lint' not to hardcode the
> checker functions' prefix, as it currently does.
>
> [...]
>
> However, `org-lint' hardcodes the prefix of the checker functions to its
> own prefix, so that to
Hi All,
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 17:22, Gustavo Barros
wrote:
This is a small feature request for `org-lint' not to hardcode the
checker
functions' prefix, as it currently does.
I've been playing with and testing this further, and I found an
uncovered corner in my initial suggestion: the
Hi All,
This is a small feature request for `org-lint' not to hardcode the
checker functions' prefix, as it currently does.
`org-lint' is a small gem in Org, specially to those fat-fingered folks
such as myself, to the point that it's been some time since I've been
fancying using it to
