Alexander Adolf writes:
Hello Timothy,
Hi :)
Interesting. Just a thought: have you considered computing a
SHA-2 hash...
I have not. Simply put, I fail to see any advantage.
This would have the advantage of solving both, your "noise
issue" and at the same time removing the threat of
Hello Timothy,
TEC writes:
> [...]
> Pros:
> - Reduced 'noise' if exported files are commited - (With HTML)
> links to particular elements in a file keep working across
>multiple versions, most of the time
> - (With HTML) links become more descriptive
>
> Cons:
> - Inceased chance
Hi All,
Noticed some autoformatting happened on send. This is how the cons
paragraph /should/ read (with a minor correction as well).
*In last email*
Cons: - Inceased chance of ID collisions across files Longer IDs
I - think this could make a nice option for export settings.
I'm - aware
:PROPERTIES:
:ID: 1161308a-ef0c-4490-bb36-13634f8de727
:END:
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3
Message-ID: <87r1t7mu52@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b;
envelope-from=tecos...@gmail.com;
