Based on discussion with Nicolas Goaziou and Eric Schulte, this patch
has been refactored and reimplemented as a patch series. Eric Schulte
has contributed additional improvements. The functionality is now in
Org.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Babel asks for confirmation to evaluate a source block even when it is
going to use the cached value. This patch skips the superfluous
confirmation in that case (no evaluation takes place, the cached value
is used).
thanks for the patch. I
Bastien bzg at altern.org writes:
thanks for the patch. I applied it but renamed cache? and
cache-current? to cache-p and cache-current-p.
Thanks. I have no preference either way regarding the names, I was just
following the example of cache?, which I copied from the original code. There's
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
There's another cache? in ob-lob, IIRC.
Fixed, thanks.
--
Bastien
Bastien bzg at altern.org writes:
thanks for the patch. I applied it but renamed cache? and
cache-current? to cache-p and cache-current-p.
That patch needs amending. You let-bind cache-current, but then try to use
cache-current-p.
Regards,
Achim.
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Bastien bzg at altern.org writes:
thanks for the patch. I applied it but renamed cache? and
cache-current? to cache-p and cache-current-p.
That patch needs amending. You let-bind cache-current, but then try to use
cache-current-p.
Er... fixed,
Babel asks for confirmation to evaluate a source block even when it is
going to use the cached value. This patch skips the superfluous
confirmation in that case (no evaluation takes place, the cached value
is used).
From da687f5a40767921c7f3f309eeda0cadb09f7116 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
