Re: [O] external/central ``macro'' definitions (for instance link abbrev's)?

2016-03-26 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Saturday, 26 Mar 2016 at 13:53, Martin Steffen wrote: [...] > I realize that my original post was perhaps unprecise. What I was looking > after is this ``awareness'' of those definitions (using the #+INCLUDE > mechanism) /not just/ for export. I was missing it Ah, I see. Yes, I believe

Re: [O] external/central ``macro'' definitions (for instance link abbrev's)?

2016-03-26 Thread Martin Steffen
Eric S Fraga ucl.ac.uk> writes: > > On Saturday, 26 Mar 2016 at 11:43, Martin Steffen wrote: > > [...] > > > Now, the #+LINK mechanism works fine as such. But I want that it works > > for all used *.org files that constituted the overall document /without/ > > repeating the definition.

Re: [O] external/central ``macro'' definitions (for instance link abbrev's)?

2016-03-26 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Saturday, 26 Mar 2016 at 11:43, Martin Steffen wrote: [...] > Now, the #+LINK mechanism works fine as such. But I want that it works > for all used *.org files that constituted the overall document /without/ > repeating the definition. Something like > > #+INCLUDE "definitions.org" > > at

[O] external/central ``macro'' definitions (for instance link abbrev's)?

2016-03-26 Thread Martin Steffen
Hi, I like to achieve the following. I do a org-document which I separate into different files (one per chapter or similar). They are all included into some "main.org". In that setup, I'd like to use some centrally defined links, like #+LINK: toollib ../../src/lib or similar, as an abbrev