[O] HTML export -- footnote section -- blank lines between footnote number and footnote text

2013-09-25 Thread D. C. Toedt
The footnote section in my HTML-export doc has the footnote number separated from the footnote text by a blank line. See http://www.commondraft.org for the document. Here's an example of what it looks like: ==BEGIN EXAMPLE== [TEXT:] The term Agreement-Related[9] refers to something – for

Re: [O] HTML export -- footnote section -- blank lines between footnote number and footnote text

2013-09-25 Thread Bastien
Hi, D. C. Toedt d...@toedt.com writes: The footnote section in my HTML-export doc has the footnote number separated from the footnote text by a blank line. See http://www.commondraft.org for the document. What did you expect instead of this rendering? Did you try to adapt the CSS to get

Re: [O] HTML export -- footnote section -- blank lines between footnote number and footnote text

2013-09-25 Thread D. C. Toedt
I thought the footnotes would come out as follows, which I believe is the way it did before I upgraded from org version 7.9.3 (I think it was): ==BEGIN EXAMPLE== [FOOTNOTES:] [9] Agreement-Related definition: This defined term is available for use in, for example, attorneys' fees clauses,

[O] #+html in footnote?

2012-02-22 Thread Samuel Wales
Is there a way to get this to work? A: That was for the ratings.[fn::For scholarly purposes: #+html: iframe width=420 height=315 src=http://www.youtube.com/embed/...?rel=0; frameborder=0 allowfullscreen/iframe ] -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com

Re: [O] #+html in footnote?

2012-02-22 Thread Samuel Wales
Sorry for the noise. It just doesn't show videos when I have a browser display from a file for some reason. -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com

Re: [O] #+html in footnote?

2012-02-22 Thread Samuel Wales
i.e. it is an issue with browse-url.