Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

Hello, Kyle Meyer writes: > Yes, c31462f33 resolved the issue. That commit also introduced a > regression: a blank string passed as the SHIFT argument causes an error. > I've followed up with 1fbc7a424 to restore the previous behavior. Indeed. Thank you. Regards, --

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Karl Voit writes: [...] >> You're right, I can confirm your issue. I get "Before first headline >> at position 1 in buffer *temp*" as well. > > Fixed (hopefully) this time. Yes, c31462f33 resolved the issue. That

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

Hello, Karl Voit writes: > * Kyle Meyer wrote: >> >> Thanks. The additional check looks good, as it replaces an error with a >> more appropriate user-error and gives an error message that is a bit >> more specific. >> >> However, the re-positioning of

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

* Kyle Meyer wrote: > > Thanks. The additional check looks good, as it replaces an error with a > more appropriate user-error and gives an error message that is a bit > more specific. > > However, the re-positioning of the org-back-to-heading call seems > problematic because the

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Thank you. I applied your patch with an additional check. Thanks. The additional check looks good, as it replaces an error with a more appropriate user-error and gives an error message that is a bit more specific. However, the re-positioning

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift (FIXED)

Hello, * Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Kyle Meyer writes: > >> Subject: [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Fix timestamp search > > Thank you. I applied your patch with an additional check. I pulled the fix from "maint" and I re-tested my test

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

Hello, Kyle Meyer writes: > Subject: [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Fix timestamp search > > * lisp/org.el (org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift): Move to the > beginning of the heading before the timestamp search so that the > user will be prompted for a time

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

Karl Voit writes: > Hi! > > I wrote a blog article on how I am using Org with recurring events > or tasks: > http://karl-voit.at/2017/01/15/org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift/ > > As Michael Maurer stated in a comment below, > org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift does not ask

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

* Karl Voit wrote: > > As Michael Maurer stated in a comment below, > org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift does not ask for time-shift > depending on the location of the cursor. He is using Org-mode version 8.2.10. -- get

[O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

Hi! I wrote a blog article on how I am using Org with recurring events or tasks: http://karl-voit.at/2017/01/15/org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift/ As Michael Maurer stated in a comment below, org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift does not ask for time-shift depending on the location of the cursor.

Re: [O] [BUG?] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift

Hi David, David Rogers davidandrewrog...@gmail.com writes: Is this something where the default has been changed recently? This behavior is new in 8.0-pre -- when in doubts, check the next release notes: http://orgmode.org/Changes.html I'm still in the process of completing these notes for

[O] [BUG?] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift

Hi everyone I like to use org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift (C-c C-x c) fairly frequently in some of my Org-mode files. Lately, it seems to have changed its function so that it creates only an exact clone, and doesn't prompt me for the time shift. Can other people reproduce this on a fairly

Re: [O] [BUG?] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift

Hi David, David Rogers davidandrewrog...@gmail.com writes: I like to use org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift (C-c C-x c) fairly frequently in some of my Org-mode files. Lately, it seems to have changed its function so that it creates only an exact clone, and doesn't prompt me for the time

Re: [O] [BUG?] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift

Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Hi David, David Rogers davidandrewrog...@gmail.com writes: I like to use org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift (C-c C-x c) fairly frequently in some of my Org-mode files. Lately, it seems to have changed its function so that it creates only an exact clone, and

[O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift adds a empty :ID:-textline [7.8.11]

Hallo all, when I do a org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift command, it adds up a left over line with just :ID: in it. The most simple way to produce it is with cloning just a single TODO item like this on: .. TODO Trockenstellen SCHEDULED:

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift shifts CREATED property of org-expiry.el

* Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca wrote: Karl Voit devn...@karl-voit.at writes: When an entry got processed by org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift, its :CREATED: property gets shifted too: #+begin_example * 2011-10-04 Tue test SCHEDULED: 2011-10-05 Wed :PROPERTIES: :CREATED: 2011-10-04 Tue

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift shifts CREATED property

Karl Voit devn...@karl-voit.at writes: Hi! When an entry got processed by org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift, its :CREATED: property gets shifted too: #+begin_example * 2011-10-04 Tue test SCHEDULED: 2011-10-05 Wed :PROPERTIES: :CREATED: 2011-10-04 Tue 17:27 :END: * 2011-10-11 Tue test

[O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift shifts CREATED property

Hi! When an entry got processed by org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift, its :CREATED: property gets shifted too: #+begin_example * 2011-10-04 Tue test SCHEDULED: 2011-10-05 Wed :PROPERTIES: :CREATED: 2011-10-04 Tue 17:27 :END: * 2011-10-11 Tue test SCHEDULED: 2011-10-12 Wed :PROPERTIES: :CREATED: