Re: [O] [BUG] Loading ob-shell fails with lexical binding

2016-06-20 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Kyle Meyer writes: > Yep, org-babel-load-languages will end up processing (shell . t) to > (require 'ob-shell), so this is the same underlying issue. I actually broke ob-shell when switching to lexical-binding a few hours ago. I just "unbroke" it. Regards, -- Nicolas

Re: [O] [BUG] Loading ob-shell fails with lexical binding

2016-06-20 Thread Kyle Meyer
Charles Millar writes: > Hi, > > > On 06/20/2016 11:56 AM, Kyle Meyer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> After moving ob-shell.el over to lexical binding (2108f0c), emacs -Q >> with "(require 'ob-shell)" reports >> >> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument sequencep

Re: [O] [BUG] Loading ob-shell fails with lexical binding

2016-06-20 Thread Charles Millar
Hi, On 06/20/2016 11:56 AM, Kyle Meyer wrote: Hello, After moving ob-shell.el over to lexical binding (2108f0c), emacs -Q with "(require 'ob-shell)" reports Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument sequencep function) concat("org-babel-execute:" function) (intern

[O] [BUG] Loading ob-shell fails with lexical binding

2016-06-20 Thread Kyle Meyer
Hello, After moving ob-shell.el over to lexical binding (2108f0c), emacs -Q with "(require 'ob-shell)" reports Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument sequencep function) concat("org-babel-execute:" function) (intern (concat "org-babel-execute:" name)) [...] It