Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Keeping this variable a customize variable invites changes also by
people who do not really know what they are doing. Turning it into
a defvar or defconst and somewhere document how to hack around the
restriction if you really
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
We can also use a very simple and tolerant regexp (e.g. =[^\000]+=), and
introduce a syntax to escape markers for fine-grained control.
FWIW this looks like the correct approach to me.
--
Bastien
Hello,
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
First of all, we should not see Org as just another plain text markup
language (no offense meant, I am sure, and none taken). Because of its
unique treatment of source code inclusion, source code markup, and
executability, it is very
Hi again
Thank you all for the responses. So as a neewb again, I dont really
understand fully all the technical specifications from the above posts,
what do you guys recommended i do if i want to start moving and using org
now full time in terms of color support? should i use the current emp.
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Another example is the emphasis stuff. There are no in-buffer
settings for it, and they would be pretty hard to make.
An in-buffer way of doing elisp is File Local Variables ; or is that not
appropriate ? Maybe the question I'm askign is : why
Hi Z,
can you show an example on how you use it? Maybe we can find a better way.
Nicolas is right that portability is compromised by customizable emphasis.
- Carsten
On 18.3.2013, at 00:02, zeltak zel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
i just finished a great conversation on #org-mode with
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
can you show an example on how you use it? Maybe we can find a better way.
Nicolas is right that portability is compromised by customizable emphasis.
On 18.3.2013, at 00:02, zeltak zel...@gmail.com wrote:
I find the ability to add custom
Dear Carsten,
Thank you for your quick reply. Let me start by first thanking you for your
great work on orgmode, I only recently discovered it (someone referred me
to your great talk on youtube) and it made me have the courage to start
learning emacs and use orgmode.
I (actually me and several
zeltak zel...@gmail.com writes:
Dear Carsten,
Thank you for your quick reply. Let me start by first thanking you
for your great work on orgmode, I only recently discovered it
(someone referred me to your great talk on youtube) and it made me
have the courage to start learning emacs and use
Dnia 2013-03-18, o godz. 15:21:54
wgreenho...@riseup.net (W. Greenhouse) napisał(a):
Perhaps a compromise could be reached on variables such as
`org-emphasis-alist' and others possibly slated for the defconst
treatment: instead of doing that, let's consider keeping them
customizable but
Hi everyone,
first a disclaimer: Nicolas has thought about all things parser a lot more
than I have, so he might disagree. But here is my take on the issue.
First of all, we should not see Org as just another plain text markup language
(no offense meant, I am sure, and none taken). Because
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
The reason why the emphasis regexp components were made configurable
in the first place is because when the feature was introduced, I had
no idea what would work, and I redesigned this part several times
over. Emphasis is a very heuristic
Hi Carsten,
Thank you for your very insightful thoughts. I would like to make one note.
2013ko martxoak 18an, Carsten Dominik-ek idatzi zuen:
Now to the discussion with Z about additional emphasis definitions
which he/she uses for custom highlighting of stuff. Right now this
relies on
Hi all
i just finished a great conversation on #org-mode with some great people.
they told me about this thread and the planned changes that may or may not
occur to the syntax and id like to just raise the newbee perspective.
I find the ability to add custom emphasise with custom faces
David Engster d...@randomsample.de writes:
Jambunathan K. writes:
Still you haven't answered my Fudging the mail reply headers question
to my satisfaction.
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/message/Mailing-Lists.html
A mailing list poster can use MFT to express that
Jambunathan K. writes:
I know that.
But that doesn't answer the question why Carsten will appear in the To
header of a mail that I reply to a mail I receive from Eric S Fraga.
Because Carsten started the thread and did not set MFT.
-David
David Engster d...@randomsample.de writes:
Jambunathan K. writes:
I know that.
But that doesn't answer the question why Carsten will appear in the To
header of a mail that I reply to a mail I receive from Eric S Fraga.
Because Carsten started the thread and did not set MFT.
In this very
Jambunathan K. writes:
David Engster d...@randomsample.de writes:
Jambunathan K. writes:
I know that.
But that doesn't answer the question why Carsten will appear in the To
header of a mail that I reply to a mail I receive from Eric S Fraga.
Because Carsten started the thread and did
David Engster d...@randomsample.de writes:
Jambunathan K. writes:
David Engster d...@randomsample.de writes:
Jambunathan K. writes:
I know that.
But that doesn't answer the question why Carsten will appear in the To
header of a mail that I reply to a mail I receive from Eric S Fraga.
19 matches
Mail list logo
