Re: [O] [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Accept 0 clones

Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr wrote: -(if (not (and (integerp n) ( n 0))) +(if (not (and (integerp n) (= n 0))) (user-error Invalid number of replications %s n)) Nitpick: (unless (wholenump n) (user-error ...)) Thanks. Updated. From

Re: [O] [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Accept 0 clones

Hello, Kyle Meyer k...@kyleam.com writes: From 37a917e4f7e4d2c05355735ab08f1f555b9dc942 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kyle Meyer k...@kyleam.com Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 21:46:54 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Accept 0 clones Thank you for the patch. -(if

Re: [O] [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Accept 0 clones

Kyle Meyer k...@kyleam.com writes: Thanks. Updated. Applied, with a minor tweak on tests so they don't fail on non-English systems. Thank you. Regards,

[O] [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Accept 0 clones

Hello, I'd like to clone a subtree with a repeating timestamp so that the repeater is removed from the original subtree and a single shifted and repeating clone is created. I don't think this is currently possible with org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift. For example, running