Hi Albert,
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Albert Krewinkel writes:
Done. As an aside: I did sign the copyright assignment papers to be
able to contrivute to Gnus, but that probably wouldn't help much, as
Org is a different project. Is that correct?
If you assigned copyright just
Hi Bastien,
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Albert Krewinkel tar...@moltkeplatz.de writes:
* org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Use `org-any-link-re' to avoid
code duplication.
This is not really code duplication, as the output of `org-any-link-re'
is different from the output of the
Albert Krewinkel writes:
Done. As an aside: I did sign the copyright assignment papers to be
able to contrivute to Gnus, but that probably wouldn't help much, as
Org is a different project. Is that correct?
If you assigned copyright just for Gnus, then you'd have to do it again
for Org. If
Hi Albert,
thanks for the patch.
Albert Krewinkel tar...@moltkeplatz.de writes:
* org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Use `org-any-link-re' to avoid
code duplication.
This is not really code duplication, as the output of `org-any-link-re'
is different from the output of the current sexp in
* org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Use `org-any-link-re' to avoid
code duplication.
The `re' variable defined in function `org-offer-links-in-entry' is
string-equal to `org-any-link-re' and is hence replaced by the latter.
This is a TINYCHANGE.
---
lisp/org.el | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 2
