Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> However, from experience, having to fix a regression when your only
> indication comes from a test you do not fully understand is a pain. To
> see what I mean, have a look at tests in
> "test-ob-header-arg-defaults.el" and imagine one of them fails…
After looking
Sebastian Miele writes:
> After some initial tooth-grinding,
My intent is not to be negative. I do understand that writing tests
takes time.
However, from experience, having to fix a regression when your only
indication comes from a test you do not fully understand is a pain. To
see what I
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> [...]
>
>
> However, your tests are very convoluted. It is better than no test, but
> if, unfortunately, one of them fail in some distant future, it may take
> more time understanding what happens in the test than actually fixing
> the bug.
>
> Would you mind rewriting
Hello,
Sebastian Miele writes:
> * testing/lisp/test-ob-emacs-lisp.el
> (test-ob-emacs-lisp-dynamic-lexical-text,
> test-ob-emacs-lisp-dynamic-lexical-expr,
> ob-emacs-lisp/dynamic-lexical-execute,
> ob-emacs-lisp/dynamic-lexical-edit): Add tests that check the
> correct handling of
* testing/lisp/test-ob-emacs-lisp.el
(test-ob-emacs-lisp-dynamic-lexical-text,
test-ob-emacs-lisp-dynamic-lexical-expr,
ob-emacs-lisp/dynamic-lexical-execute,
ob-emacs-lisp/dynamic-lexical-edit): Add tests that check the
correct handling of the :lexical header argument when executing
