Re: [O] [RFC] removing all results WAS: Re: idempotency ... org-babel-remove-inline-result

Hello Charles, Charles C. Berry writes: Further Daniele's response to '[bug] Removing the Babel results': http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/94604 See below. But why a `native' function? You know how to achieve this result and can 1. add a customized function to your init

Re: [O] [RFC] removing all results WAS: Re: idempotency ... org-babel-remove-inline-result

Further Daniele's response to '[bug] Removing the Babel results': http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/94604 See below. On Sat, 31 Jan 2015, Charles C. Berry wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015, Daniele Pizzolli wrote: [discussing the RFC, now] Hello Charles, Charles C. Berry writes:

Re: [O] [RFC] removing all results WAS: Re: idempotency ... org-babel-remove-inline-result

Charles C. Berry ccbe...@ucsd.edu writes: [discussion of extra whitespace bug deleted] There is now a bugfix on master. I've also added 'interactive' to `org-babel-remove-inline-result'. Thanks. Would you mind providing a test case for this? Regards,

Re: [O] [RFC] removing all results WAS: Re: idempotency ... org-babel-remove-inline-result

On Sat, 31 Jan 2015, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Charles C. Berry ccbe...@ucsd.edu writes: [discussion of extra whitespace bug deleted] There is now a bugfix on master. I've also added 'interactive' to `org-babel-remove-inline-result'. Thanks. Would you mind providing a test case for this? I

Re: [O] [RFC] removing all results WAS: Re: idempotency ... org-babel-remove-inline-result

On Sat, 31 Jan 2015, Daniele Pizzolli wrote: [discussing the RFC, now] Hello Charles, Charles C. Berry writes: RFC: the patch to `org-babel-remove-inline-result-one-or-many' removes inline results, too. Do you see any bad consequences? On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Daniele Pizzolli wrote: Hello

Re: [O] [RFC] removing all results WAS: Re: idempotency ... org-babel-remove-inline-result

Charles C. Berry ccbe...@ucsd.edu writes: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Thanks. Would you mind providing a test case for this? I just pushed one to master. Thank you. Regards,

Re: [O] [RFC] removing all results WAS: Re: idempotency ... org-babel-remove-inline-result

Hello Charles, Charles C. Berry writes: RFC: the patch to `org-babel-remove-inline-result-one-or-many' removes inline results, too. Do you see any bad consequences? On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Daniele Pizzolli wrote: Hello Charles, Charles C. Berry writes: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Daniele

[O] [RFC] removing all results WAS: Re: idempotency ... org-babel-remove-inline-result

RFC: the patch to `org-babel-remove-inline-result-one-or-many' removes inline results, too. Do you see any bad consequences? On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Daniele Pizzolli wrote: Hello Charles, Charles C. Berry writes: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Daniele Pizzolli wrote: [discussion of extra