Re: [O] [feature] Handle recurrence in <> and [] dates

2018-11-17 Thread Marco Wahl
>> AFAICT the performance of marking tasks done which contain *a lot* of >> inactive timestams has degraded considerably with this change. >> >> Example: >> >> #v+ >> * TODO task >> SCHEDULED: <2018-11-15 .+1d> >> :PROPERTIES: >> :STYLE:habit >> :LAST_REPEAT: [2018-11-14 16:26] >> :END: >> >> [

Re: [O] [feature] Handle recurrence in <> and [] dates

2018-11-17 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Marco Wahl writes: > AFAICT the performance of marking tasks done which contain *a lot* of > inactive timestams has degraded considerably with this change. > > Example: > > #v+ > * TODO task > SCHEDULED: <2018-11-15 .+1d> > :PROPERTIES: > :STYLE:habit > :LAST_REPEAT: [2018-11-14 16:26

Re: [O] [feature] Handle recurrence in <> and [] dates

2018-11-14 Thread Marco Wahl
Hi! > Leo Gaspard writes: > >> Here is a translated example task from my .org file: >> >> *** TODO Check bank report >> SCHEDULED: <2000-02-10 Thu +1m> >> >> Dated [2000-01-01 Sat +1m] >> >> The point of this “Dated” field being to tell me to which report I >> should be looking, given I s

Re: [O] [feature] Handle recurrence in <> and [] dates

2018-11-10 Thread Leo Gaspard
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Org didn't handle repeaters in inactive time stamps. This is now fixed > (in master). Thank you. Great, thank you!

Re: [O] [feature] Handle recurrence in <> and [] dates

2018-11-10 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Leo Gaspard writes: > Here is a translated example task from my .org file: > > *** TODO Check bank report > SCHEDULED: <2000-02-10 Thu +1m> > > Dated [2000-01-01 Sat +1m] > > The point of this “Dated” field being to tell me to which report I > should be looking, given I sometimes

Re: [O] [feature] Handle recurrence in <> and [] dates

2018-11-06 Thread Leo Gaspard
Hi Julius, Julius Dittmar writes: > if you want a task to re-open at a later date upon closing, add a line of > :REPEAT_TO_STATE: TODO > to the PROPERTIES drawer of that task. Well, I guess I stated my problem poorly, sorry :) Here is a translated example task from my .org file: *** TODO Check

Re: [O] [feature] Handle recurrence in <> and [] dates

2018-11-06 Thread Julius Dittmar
Hi Leo, if you want a task to re-open at a later date upon closing, add a line of :REPEAT_TO_STATE: TODO to the PROPERTIES drawer of that task. Hth, Julius

Re: [O] [feature] Handle recurrence in <> and [] dates

2018-11-06 Thread Leo Gaspard
Hello all! It's been ~2 weeks so I hope you'll forgive me bumping my post :) Do you have an opinion about this idea? Cheers, Leo Leo Gaspard writes: > Hello all! > > I have been using org-mode for a few days (switching over from > todo.txt [1]), and for the time being my experience has been

[O] [feature] Handle recurrence in <> and [] dates

2018-10-22 Thread Leo Gaspard
Hello all! I have been using org-mode for a few days (switching over from todo.txt [1]), and for the time being my experience has been great! There is a single thing I found weird up to now: it seems that recurrence tags in <> and [] “tags” don't get bumped when a task is completed and has a recu