On Friday, 27 Apr 2018 at 09:46, Bastien wrote:
[...]
> Does that make sense to you?
It does. Thanks.
In any case, getting rid of the * END bit will be nice. And I've
already moved to using drawers for a large number of my inline task use
cases, the ones that weren't really tasks!
--
Er
Hi Eric,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Using *s seems confusing as they are intended for headlines. From a
> font lock point of view, I would have thought that ! at the start of the
> line would be easier as well.
I should have said that I don't like having a new syntax like this.
My whole point cou
On Friday, 27 Apr 2018 at 01:34, Bastien wrote:
[...]
> I'd favor a solution where inline tasks are really simple:
>
> 0. Prevent cycling for tasks with a high number of stars
>("high" being defined by the user as an option).
>
> 1. Allow TODO keywords, priority, tags, SCHEDULED and DEADLINE
Hi Nicolas and Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Either we keep it as the hack, or use the limitation you
> mention and get rid of the END line.
I think getting rid of the END line goes in the right direction...
> But I am not sure it is really with the trouble to replace a bad
> hack with a
Hi Nicolas,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
> > I would be interested to discuss a better solution. It would be nice is
> > list items could be TODO's, but I though long and har about this back
> when,
> > and over allo those yea
Kaushal Modi writes:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018, 5:35 PM Eric Abrahamsen
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Would there be any consideration for an inline syntax that looks more
>> like a link? Personally, when I want inline TODOs, I want them because
>> there's a particular chunk of text that I need to do something
Kaushal Modi writes:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018, 5:35 PM Eric Abrahamsen
> wrote:
>
> Would there be any consideration for an inline syntax that looks
> more
> like a link? Personally, when I want inline TODOs, I want them
> because
> there's a particular chunk of text that I nee
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018, 5:35 PM Eric Abrahamsen
wrote:
>
> Would there be any consideration for an inline syntax that looks more
> like a link? Personally, when I want inline TODOs, I want them because
> there's a particular chunk of text that I need to do something with.
> What about something tha
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> I would be interested to discuss a better solution. It would be nice is
>> list items could be TODO's, but I though long and har about this back when,
>> and over allo those years, I could not think of anything that could be
>> i
Hello,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I would be interested to discuss a better solution. It would be nice is
> list items could be TODO's, but I though long and har about this back when,
> and over allo those years, I could not think of anything that could be
> implemented with reasonable effort.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Monday, 23 Apr 2018 at 15:50, alain.coch...@unistra.fr wrote:
> > In fact, my use of inelintaks seems to me so basic (I faced the
> > problem since my day 1 with org-mode) that maybe another solution that
> > I overlooked would work for me
On Monday, 23 Apr 2018 at 15:50, alain.coch...@unistra.fr wrote:
> In fact, my use of inelintaks seems to me so basic (I faced the
> problem since my day 1 with org-mode) that maybe another solution that
> I overlooked would work for me. I'll explain my problem in the hope
> that someone might be
Nicolas Goaziou writes on Mon 16 Apr 2018 14:08:
> Inlinetasks has a lot of glitches [...]. It is not ready for prime
> time. Worse, I don't think its design is good, either.
I would be glad to be able to use an alternative. I see that
"drawers" are mentioned by some of you experts, but it i
13 matches
Mail list logo
