Hello Carsten et al,
--- On Tue, 3/29/11, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> --- On Mon, 3/28/11, Carsten Dominik
> Maybe I spoke too soon. I tried the
org-agenda-show-all-dates == nil. Although it worked,
without the warning about the month-long gaps it was a bit
hard to navigate. It was easier to nav
On 29.3.2011, at 19:38, Mark S wrote:
> Hello Carsten et al,
>
>
> --- On Mon, 3/28/11, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> > The ideal solution would be that the Timeline view
>> > would process dates exactly like the agenda,
>> including
>> > multiple-files, but display them like the traditional
>>
Hello Carsten et al,
--- On Mon, 3/28/11, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> The ideal solution would be that the Timeline view
> would process dates exactly like the agenda,
including
> multiple-files, but display them like the traditional
> timeline, with ranges of dates omitted.
This is already poss
On 24.3.2011, at 18:31, Mark S wrote:
> Hello Carsten et al,
>
> --- On Thu, 3/24/11, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> 1. Be satisfied with the way things are, just realize
>> that repeaters only show up on the first date when
>> the event happens for the first time.
>
> This would mean that y
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Maybe I can add the following background information to Nick's
> amazing analysis.
I wouldn't call it "amazing", but thanks for the kind words!
>
> - The timeline was the first agenda-like view I implemented,
> it used to be (many years ago) the only w
Hello Carsten et al,
--- On Thu, 3/24/11, Carsten Dominik wrote:
1. Be satisfied with the way things are, just realize
that repeaters only show up on the first date when
the event happens for the first time.
This would mean that you could never *trust* the
timeline when dealing with ev
Hi everyone,
On 22.3.2011, at 21:10, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Some more comments and another bug in org-timeline:
>
> o a repeater always gets reported on its initial date - it only gets reported
> on subsequent instances iff it coincides with some other entry that will be
> reported on that date.
Mark S wrote:
>
> Lisp tends to bring out my inner dyslexic, but is it possible to use
> a "while" or other construct instead of "mapcar" and then make the
> "if" construction inside of the lambda check for the :omitted symbol
> and return it as nil? And it would need to break out of the loop a
ndar is to be
drawn OR there is a global end-date / end-range variable.
Mark
--- On Tue, 3/22/11, Nick Dokos wrote:
From: Nick Dokos
Subject: Re: [O] Bug: Recurring items NEVER show up in timeline
unaccompanied
To: throa...@yahoo.com
Cc: nicholas.do...@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Date:
Some more comments and another bug in org-timeline:
o a repeater always gets reported on its initial date - it only gets reported
on subsequent instances iff it coincides with some other entry that will be
reported on that date.
o the initial comment of org-timeline says "Only entries with a
Mark S wrote:
>
> You know, I think this may be the same bug I ran into 3 years ago when I
> last tried Org-mode. Is there any hope that this will be addressed? I note
> that this forum is the only location given for sending bug reports in the
> documentation.
>
> Thanks!
> Mark
>
I wen
You know, I think this may be the same bug I ran into 3 years ago when I
last tried Org-mode. Is there any hope that this will be addressed? I note
that this forum is the only location given for sending bug reports in the
documentation.
Thanks!
Mark
--- On Sat, 3/19/11, Nick Dokos wrote
12 matches
Mail list logo